Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

What is a valid object hierarchy when building a Snowflake environment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Effective pruning in Snowflake relies on the organization of data within micro-partitions. By using an ORDER BY clause with clustering keys when loading data into the reporting tables, Snowflake can better organize the data within micro-partitions. This organization allows Snowflake to skip over irrelevant micro-partitions during a query, thus improving query performance and reducing the amount of data scanned12.

Reference =

* Snowflake Documentation on micro-partitions and data clustering2

* Community article on recognizing unsatisfactory pruning and improving it1


Contribute your Thoughts:

Alaine
1 months ago
I'm just gonna stare at the options until one of them jumps out and says, 'Pick me, I'm the right answer!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
1 months ago
Option D is the only way to go. You know what they say, 'The more stages, the merrier!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
1 months ago
Hmm, Option C is throwing me off. Skipping the Database level? Bold move, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
4 days ago
I would go with Option A as well. It seems like the most logical hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
23 days ago
I agree, Option C seems to be missing the Database level. It might cause some issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
28 days ago
I think Option A is the correct hierarchy for building a Snowflake environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kallie
2 months ago
D is the way to go, baby! Straight from the top down, just like my love life.
upvoted 0 times
Cristal
5 days ago
I agree, A seems to be the most logical choice for organizing the objects in Snowflake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
7 days ago
I think A is the correct hierarchy for building a Snowflake environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
13 days ago
D is the way to go, baby! Straight from the top down, just like my love life.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonso
2 months ago
I'm going with Option B. Gotta have that Organization level in there!
upvoted 0 times
Paola
23 days ago
I agree, Option A makes the most sense to me too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
1 months ago
I think Option A is the correct hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittni
2 months ago
Option A looks correct to me. That's the standard hierarchy I've seen in Snowflake environments.
upvoted 0 times
Vicky
1 months ago
Yes, that hierarchy makes the most sense for organizing data in Snowflake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
2 months ago
I agree, option A seems to be the most common hierarchy for Snowflake environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giuseppe
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B) Organization --> Account --> Database --> Schema --> Stage could also be a valid hierarchy. It depends on the specific requirements of the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
3 months ago
I agree with Chanel. It makes sense to have the hierarchy structured that way for a Snowflake environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
3 months ago
I think the valid object hierarchy is A) Account --> Database --> Schema --> Warehouse.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77