Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A Snowflake Architect is designing a multi-tenant application strategy for an organization in the Snowflake Data Cloud and is considering using an Account Per Tenant strategy.

Which requirements will be addressed with this approach? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

The Account Per Tenant strategy involves creating separate Snowflake accounts for each tenant within the multi-tenant application. This approach offers a number of advantages.

Option B: With separate accounts, each tenant's environment is isolated, making security and RBAC policies simpler to configure and maintain. This is because each account can have its own set of roles and privileges without the risk of cross-tenant access or the complexity of maintaining a highly granular permission model within a shared environment.

Option D: This approach also allows for each tenant to have a unique data shape, meaning that the database schema can be tailored to the specific needs of each tenant without affecting others. This can be essential when tenants have different data models, usage patterns, or application customizations.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sharika
13 days ago
A and E? What is this, a trick question? Everyone knows that the account-per-tenant strategy is all about flexibility and security, not about reducing object counts or storage costs. B and D for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
14 days ago
Hmm, I'm going to have to go with B and D as well. Simplifying security and accommodating data diversity are key benefits of the account-per-tenant approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
15 days ago
C and E? Really? Snowflake's auto-scaling and shared storage model already take care of those, don't they? I'd go with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
Evette
1 days ago
Unique data shape per tenant is also a key requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
8 days ago
I agree, RBAC policies are important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bobbye
1 months ago
B and D seem like the right choices here. Separate accounts per tenant makes access control a breeze and allows for unique data requirements per tenant.
upvoted 0 times
Justa
7 days ago
Yes, and it also allows for unique data shapes per tenant which can be very beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
14 days ago
I agree, having separate accounts per tenant definitely simplifies access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matt
1 months ago
I believe option B is also crucial. Security and RBAC policies should be simple to configure for each tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
1 months ago
I agree with Man. Having fewer objects per tenant and unique data shape per tenant are important requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
2 months ago
I think option A and D will be addressed with this approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77