Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A Snowflake Architect Is working with Data Modelers and Table Designers to draft an ELT framework specifically for data loading using Snowpipe. The Table Designers will add a timestamp column that Inserts the current tlmestamp as the default value as records are loaded into a table. The Intent is to capture the time when each record gets loaded into the table; however, when tested the timestamps are earlier than the loae_take column values returned by the copy_history function or the Copy_HISTORY view (Account Usage).

Why Is this occurring?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Using Snowpipe for continuous, automated data ingestion minimizes the need for manual intervention and ensures that data is available in Snowflake promptly after it is generated. Leveraging Snowflake's data sharing capabilities allows for efficient and secure access to the vendor's data without the need for complex API integrations. Materialized views provide pre-aggregated data for fast access, which is ideal for dashboards that require high performance1234.

Reference =

* Snowflake Documentation on Snowpipe4

* Snowflake Documentation on Secure Data Sharing2

* Best Practices for Data Ingestion with Snowflake1


Contribute your Thoughts:

Gene
28 days ago
So, the architects are working with the table designers, but the timestamps are still off? Looks like they need to put on their 'snow' goggles and see the problem clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
1 months ago
Hold on, the CURRENT_TIME is evaluated when the load operation is compiled? That's just plain weird. Snowflake needs to get their act together.
upvoted 0 times
Marguerita
1 days ago
C) The Table Designer team has not used the localtimestamp or systimestamp functions in the Snowflake copy statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
3 days ago
B) The Snowflake timezone parameter Is different from the cloud provider's parameters causing the mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
12 days ago
A) The timestamps are different because there are parameter setup mismatches. The parameters need to be realigned
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherrie
1 months ago
Wait, they didn't use the localtimestamp or systimestamp functions? That's rookie mistake 101! No wonder the timestamps are off.
upvoted 0 times
Bobbye
1 days ago
C: The Snowflake timezone parameter Is different from the cloud provider's parameters causing the mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
2 days ago
B: Yeah, using localtimestamp or systimestamp functions would have been a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
18 days ago
A: The timestamps are different because there are parameter setup mismatches. The parameters need to be realigned.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aja
2 months ago
Ah, I see! The timezone mismatch between Snowflake and the cloud provider is the culprit here. They'll need to ensure the timezones are in sync.
upvoted 0 times
Marylou
1 months ago
B) The Snowflake timezone parameter Is different from the cloud provider's parameters causing the mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
1 months ago
A) The timestamps are different because there are parameter setup mismatches. The parameters need to be realigned
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacob
2 months ago
The timestamps are definitely different due to parameter setup mismatches. The Snowflake team needs to align the parameters properly to get the correct timestamps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
Maybe the Table Designers should use localtimestamp or systimestamp functions in the Snowflake copy statement to fix this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 months ago
I agree, the mismatch in timezone parameters could be causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
3 months ago
I think the issue is with the timezone parameter.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77