Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PeopleCert Exam ITIL-4-Foundation Topic 2 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's ITIL-4-Foundation exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 2
[All ITIL-4-Foundation Questions]

Which approach is CORRECT when applying the guiding principle 'keep it simple and practical'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Don't start from scratch and build something new without considering what you already have. It's almost always better to improve what you currently have than to throw it all away and start again, although you must also be able to recognise when a complete replacement is, in fact, needed.

Not only is this approach less wasteful than starting from scratch -- because it preserves value that you already have -- but it also helps you to keep your people on board. They're much more likely to support the changes you need if their previous contributions have been appropriately valued.

Don't rely on metrics and reports to tell you what the current situation is. When you carry out an assessment you should observe what is happening for yourself, and just use the metrics to support your observations.

https://www.sysaid.com/blog/itil/the-7-guiding-principles-of-itil-4-practical-advice-to-help-you-make-decisions


Contribute your Thoughts:

Nikita
1 months ago
Personally, I'm a fan of the 'keep it simple, silly' approach. A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Corinne
8 days ago
Launa: It just makes everything easier to manage
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
12 days ago
User 2: Definitely, keeping it simple is key
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
13 days ago
User 1: I agree, A) Only add controls and metrics when they are needed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ma
2 months ago
D sounds too restrictive. What about controls that aren't strictly for compliance but still provide value? I'd go with A.
upvoted 0 times
Leandro
13 days ago
I see your point, but D does have its merits in ensuring compliance. It's a tough choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
14 days ago
I think B could work too, designing first and then removing what's not necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
1 months ago
I agree, A seems like the best option. Only adding what is needed makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lina
2 months ago
Hah, C is like the kitchen sink approach. Adding controls one by one until the whole system is bloated? No thanks!
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
8 days ago
D) Only add controls and metrics that are required for compliance
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
12 days ago
B) Design controls and metrics first, then remove those not adding value
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
20 days ago
A) Only add controls and metrics when they are needed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
2 months ago
I disagree, I think B is the way to go. Design everything first, then trim the fat. That ensures you have a solid foundation to work from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
Option A definitely aligns with the 'keep it simple and practical' principle. Why add extra controls and metrics if they're not needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think D) Only add controls and metrics that are required for compliance makes the most sense in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe B) Design controls and metrics first, then remove those not adding value is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
2 months ago
I think the correct approach is A) Only add controls and metrics when they are needed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77