Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1091-22 Topic 4 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1091-22 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 4
[All 1Z0-1091-22 Questions]

The client has installed scalar devices to measure the solar energy generated (export) and the energy received (import) from the market. This data is stored in separate measuring components (registers). The validation rules are generally the same for both measuring components, but there is one exception: the negative consumption check applies only to energy received (import).

Which TWO configurations ensure that the negative consumption rule is checked for energy received (import) only?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

The client has installed scalar devices to measure the solar energy generated (export) and the energy received (import) from the market. This data is stored in separate measuring components (registers). The validation rules are generally the same for both measuring components, but there is one exception: the negative consumption check applies only to energy received (import). According to the Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management Business User Guide, two configurations that ensure that the negative consumption check is checked for energy received (import) only are:

Use eligibility criteria: These are rules that determine whether a VEE rule should be applied or not based on certain conditions or characteristics. Eligibility criteria can be used to apply the negative consumption check only to the measuring component that has a characteristic value indicating energy received (import).

Use the Skip flag in the VEE rule: This is a flag that indicates whether a VEE rule should be skipped or not based on certain conditions or characteristics. The Skip flag can be used to skip the negative consumption check for the measuring component that has a characteristic value indicating energy generated (export).


Contribute your Thoughts:

Derick
2 months ago
B) Modifying the base VEE rule could be risky. What if it affects other parts of the system? Better play it safe with the more targeted options.
upvoted 0 times
Paris
1 months ago
E) Using the Skip flag in the VEE rule is a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 months ago
A) Modifying the base VEE rule could have unintended consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
1 months ago
B) Modify the base VEE rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 months ago
A) Create two different VEE groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lanie
2 months ago
This question is a real energy-sapper! Gotta power through it though, can't let the competition out-shine me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
3 months ago
A) Creating two different VEE groups might be overkill, but it could work. Seems like a more manual approach compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
1 months ago
A) I agree, creating two different VEE groups might be a bit manual, but it could provide a clear separation for the negative consumption check on energy received (import).
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
1 months ago
E) Using the Skip flag in the Validation, Estimation, and Editing (VEE) rule could also be a good option to differentiate the validation rules for energy received (import).
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
1 months ago
B) Modifying the base VEE rule seems like a more efficient way to ensure the negative consumption rule is checked for energy received (import) only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
2 months ago
A) Creating two different VEE groups might be overkill, but it could work. Seems like a more manual approach compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronnie
3 months ago
E) Using the Skip flag in the VEE rule is an interesting approach. It allows you to selectively apply the rule, which could be handy in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Adelle
2 months ago
E) Using the Skip flag in the VEE rule is an interesting approach. It allows you to selectively apply the rule, which could be handy in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
2 months ago
A) Create two different VEE groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tabetha
3 months ago
D) Use eligibility criteria seems like the way to go. Keeps the negative consumption check in place for import, but doesn't apply it to the export data.
upvoted 0 times
Juan
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
3 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickolas
3 months ago
I'm not sure about using eligibility criteria or removing the negative consumption check from the VEE group. It might cause confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
3 months ago
I agree with Yuki. Modifying the base VEE rule could also help in ensuring the rule is checked only for energy received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
3 months ago
I think we should create two different VEE groups to check the negative consumption rule for energy received.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77