Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Oracle Exam 1Z0-1091-22 Topic 10 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-1091-22 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 10
[All 1Z0-1091-22 Questions]

A customer is starting an Advanced Meter Infrastructure (AMI) roll-out initiative and they plan to replace their legacy scalar time-of-use (TOU) meters with smart meters. They want customer information system (CIS) to continue to bill for the same TOU periods and they do not want to change the CIS rates.

In which THREE ways can you configure Meter Data Management (MDM) to support this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C

In a SaaS environment, Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management and Smart Grid Gateway are deployed on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and use OCI Object Storage to store files and data. OCI Object Storage is a scalable and secure service that allows users to store and access data from anywhere using REST APIs or web consoles. Smart Grid Gateway adapters process usage and device event payloads via batch processing. Files are sent from a head-end system (HES) to an OCI Object Storage location, where they are batch processed. According to the Oracle Utilities Smart Grid Gateway User Guide, some operations that are performed by the Smart Grid Gateway processes are:

Parse payload into individual usage readings/device events. This is an operation that extracts usage readings or device events from the payload file and converts them into individual records.

Invoke IMD/Device Event Seeder (as appropriate). This is an operation that invokes a web service that sends usage readings or device events to Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management for further processing.

Transform usage readings into standard (unified) format. This is an operation that converts usage readings from vendor-specific formats into a standard format that can be processed by Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leandro
1 months ago
All these options sound like they involve a lot of 'configuration' and 'calculation groups.' Maybe the customer should just stick with their trusty old scalar TOU meters and call it a day!
upvoted 0 times
Christene
2 days ago
User 2: Maybe the customer is looking for more advanced features with the smart meters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
22 days ago
User 1: It does seem like a lot of work to set up those configuration options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Detra
2 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher! I hope the correct answer isn't hidden in some obscure technical manual. 'Meter Data Management' - sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 months ago
I'm not a fan of the custom algorithm in option A. That feels like a risky and unsustainable approach. Better to leverage the existing MDM functionality.
upvoted 0 times
Wynell
4 days ago
User 3: Adding a new usage calculation group with a TOU mapping rule might be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
5 days ago
User 2: We could just add the TOU mapping rule to the existing usage calculation group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, using a custom algorithm seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
2 months ago
Option E is interesting, but it might be overkill for this scenario. Dynamically identifying the usage calculation group via plug-in logic could be more complex than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Derick
4 days ago
D: Adding a new usage calculation group with a TOU mapping rule could also be a viable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
5 days ago
C: Option C also seems like a good choice, adding the TOU mapping rule to the existing group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
16 days ago
B: I agree, adding an extendable lookup value seems like a simple solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
29 days ago
A: I think option B could work well for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlota
2 months ago
I personally prefer option D because adding a new usage calculation group with a TOU mapping rule seems like a straightforward solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
2 months ago
C and D seem like the most straightforward options to configure the MDM to support the customer's requirement. The TOU mapping rule should be added to the existing usage calculation group, and a new usage calculation group with a TOU mapping rule can be added as well.
upvoted 0 times
Peggy
28 days ago
That's a good point, it could provide more flexibility in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
29 days ago
We could also consider setting up the new usage calculation group to be identified dynamically by plug-in logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 months ago
I agree, adding the TOU mapping rule to the existing usage calculation group seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
2 months ago
C and D are definitely the most straightforward options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myra
2 months ago
I agree with Annelle. Option B seems like the most efficient way to support the requirement without changing the CIS rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
3 months ago
I think option B is the best choice because it allows for flexibility in adding new device configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77