Nutanix Exam NCP-EUC Topic 7 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-EUC exam

Question #: 28
Topic #: 7

How should the storage containers be configured to follow Nutanix storage best practices?

AUse a single container.
Enable Compression and Deduplication for both VMS

BUse separate containers.
Enable Compression for non-persistent VMS.
Enable Compression and Deduplication for persistent VMS

CUse a single container.
Enable Compression and Erasure Coding for both VMS

DUse separate containers.
Enable Compression for persistent VMS.
Enable Compression and Deduplication for nan-persistent VMS

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

The Nutanix AHV MCS Plug-in is a tool that enables Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops Delivery Controllers (also called Brokers) to create and manage Citrix-provisioned VMs in a Nutanix AHV infrastructure environment.The plug-in is based on the Citrix-defined plug-in framework2.

To install the Nutanix AHV MCS Plug-in, you need to meet some prerequisites, such as:

The Delivery Controller version must be 7.15 LTSR CU3 or later.

The Delivery Controller must be able to communicate with Prism Element (PE) using HTTPS port 9440.

The Delivery Controller must have PowerShell 5.1 or later installed.

The user running the installer must have administrator privileges on the Delivery Controller2.

https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/solutions/details?targetId=RA-2020-Citrix-Virtual-Apps-and-Desktops-AMD-MCS-Windows-10:RA-2020-Citrix-Virtual-Apps-and-Desktops-AMD-MCS-Windows-10

by Robt at Jun 02, 2024, 05:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-EUC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Hortencia

1 months ago

Option B is the way to go, folks. Unless, of course, you want to end up in a world of storage mayhem. Although, who knows, maybe option D is just a secret Nutanix initiation rite?

upvoted 0 times

Tracie

2 days ago

User 3: I agree, it's important to follow best practices for Nutanix storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johna

10 days ago

Yeah, option D seems a bit confusing. Stick with option B for Nutanix best practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

14 days ago

User 2: Yeah, separate containers with different settings seem like a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

18 days ago

I agree, enabling different features based on VM type can help optimize storage efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

19 days ago

User 1: I think option B is the best choice for storage containers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

23 days ago

I think option B is the best choice. Separate containers for different types of VMS make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

2 months ago

I'm going with B. It's the only one that makes sense to me. Although, I wonder if the Nutanix engineers were drinking their own Kool-Aid when they came up with these options.

upvoted 0 times

Ora

18 days ago

Definitely. It's important to follow best practices for optimal performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

24 days ago

Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. It seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julie

25 days ago

I think B is the way to go. Separate containers for different types of VMS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

2 months ago

D? Really? Putting compression on the non-persistent VMs and deduplication on the persistent ones? That's just backward!

upvoted 0 times

Kenia

16 days ago

B) Use separate containers. Enable Compression for non-persistent VMS. Enable Compression and Deduplication for persistent VMS

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

19 days ago

C) Use a single container. Enable Compression and Erasure Coding for both VMS

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

24 days ago

B) Use separate containers. Enable Compression for non-persistent VMS. Enable Compression and Deduplication for persistent VMS

upvoted 0 times

...

Chandra

2 months ago

A) Use a single container. Enable Compression and Deduplication for both VMS

upvoted 0 times

...

Domingo

2 months ago

I prefer using a single container with Erasure Coding for both VMS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

2 months ago

I'm torn between B and C. Erasure coding might be overkill, but I like the simplicity of a single container. Hmm, decisions, decisions...

upvoted 0 times

Lorita

15 days ago

Cristy: Hmm, maybe I'll reconsider my choice and go with C as well. Thanks for the input!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stanton

17 days ago

User 3: I agree with Stanton. C seems like a good choice for Nutanix storage best practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristy

19 days ago

User 2: I see your point, but I prefer C. Simplicity with a single container and erasure coding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anastacia

27 days ago

User 1: I think B is the way to go. Separate containers for different types of VMS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

2 months ago

I agree, enabling Compression for non-persistent VMS makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

2 months ago

Option B seems to be the way to go. Separating the containers and applying the right compression and deduplication settings based on the VM types is a best practice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

2 months ago

I think we should use separate containers.

upvoted 0 times

...