An organization recently deployed an Active-passive VDI solution across multiple sites within their Nutanix platforms. The Organization is now on phase two of the project, which requires them to consolidate all user profile and home data, since each location will have its own standalone Microsoft File Server.
Which solution will provide a more easily-managed environment for profile and Home Share data that includes High Availability and a unified single namespace?
An administrator is supporting two Nutanix Io-node AHV clusters (Cluster01 and Cluster02) dedicated for VDI workloads. The administrator has started receiving complaints regarding the performance of several full clone virtual desktops within Cluster01, upon review of both clusters, below are the discovered utilization metrics:
Cluster01 utilizations:
* Cluster CPU:85%
* Cluster Memory: 94%
* storage:50%
Cluster02 utilizations:
* Cluster CPU:30%
* Cluster Memory:35%
* storage:40%
Datacenter policy requires 20% resource overhead.
Which action should the administrator take to resolve this issue?
administrator can take to resolve the issue of performance for several full clone virtual desktops within Cluster01 by migrating them to Cluster02.
A company is planning to implement Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops on Nutanix clusters running AHV.
The initial implementation will be sized for 1000 virtual desktops with Windows 1 1, Microsoft Office 2021 and Adobe Creative Cloud All Apps installed.
What is the correct prerequisite to implement a successful installation of the Nutanix AHV MCS Plug-in?
To install the Nutanix AHV MCS Plug-in, you need to meet some prerequisites, such as:
The Delivery Controller version must be 7.15 LTSR CU3 or later.
The Delivery Controller must be able to communicate with Prism Element (PE) using HTTPS port 9440.
The Delivery Controller must have PowerShell 5.1 or later installed.
The user running the installer must have administrator privileges on the Delivery Controller2.
An administrator is supporting two Nutanix Io-node AHV clusters (Cluster01 and Cluster02) dedicated for VDI workloads. The administrator has started receiving complaints regarding the performance of several full clone virtual desktops within Cluster01, upon review of both clusters, below are the discovered utilization metrics:
Cluster01 utilizations:
* Cluster CPU:85%
* Cluster Memory: 94%
* storage:50%
Cluster02 utilizations:
* Cluster CPU:30%
* Cluster Memory:35%
* storage:40%
Datacenter policy requires 20% resource overhead.
Which action should the administrator take to resolve this issue?
administrator can take to resolve the issue of performance for several full clone virtual desktops within Cluster01 by migrating them to Cluster02.
An organization recently deployed an Active-passive VDI solution across multiple sites within their Nutanix platforms. The Organization is now on phase two of the project, which requires them to consolidate all user profile and home data, since each location will have its own standalone Microsoft File Server.
Which solution will provide a more easily-managed environment for profile and Home Share data that includes High Availability and a unified single namespace?
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!