Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-EUC Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-EUC exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 5
[All NCP-EUC Questions]

A company is using Citrix for virtual desktops on Nutanix with AHV. The studio has 10,000 users who will be connecting to this infrastructure and have deployed a dedicated Files cluster for holding the user home shares.

Since this is a dedicated cluster with dual Intel 6242 28 GHz 16 Core processors and 192GB of RAM, what should be done for the FSVM and

CVM configuration to allow for optimal performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Geraldo
1 months ago
Wait, we're talking about Nutanix, right? I thought this was a trick question and the answer was just 'buy more Nutanix nodes'.
upvoted 0 times
Marget
8 days ago
A: I think we need to increase the CVM vCPUs to 16 and the FSVM vCPUs to 12.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julio
1 months ago
You know, if this were a real-life scenario, I'd just ask the Nutanix support team. They'd probably have the perfect config for my eyes-wide-shut.
upvoted 0 times
Rikki
5 days ago
That sounds like a solid plan for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
9 days ago
I think increasing the CVM vCPUs to 16 and the FSW vCPUs to 12 would be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
17 days ago
Yeah, Nutanix support team is always helpful with configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonny
2 months ago
C looks good to me. Keeping the CVM vCPUs at 12 and boosting the FSVM to 8 vCPUs should give us a nice balance of compute power.
upvoted 0 times
Thersa
1 months ago
User1: Definitely, that configuration should help optimize performance for the virtual desktops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
1 months ago
User2: Agreed, keeping the CVM vCPUs at 12 and increasing the FSVM vCPUs to 8 sounds like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
1 months ago
User1: I think C is the way to go. It's a good balance of resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorthy
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards D. Increasing the FSVM RAM makes sense, but I don't think we need to beef up the CVM that much. Let's keep it lean and mean!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
2 months ago
Hmm, I think B is the way to go. Dedicating more RAM to the FSVM will really help with file operations and storage performance for those 10,000 users.
upvoted 0 times
Annabelle
27 days ago
User 2: Yeah, increasing the CVM RAM to 64GB and the FSVM RAM to 96GB seems like the best option for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, dedicating more RAM to the FSVM will definitely improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
I think increasing the CVM RAM to 64GB and the FSVM RAM to 96GB would be the best option for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should leave the CVM vCPUs at 12 and increase the FSVM vCPUs to 8 instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
3 months ago
I think we should increase the CVM vCPUs to 16 and the FSW vCPUs to 12 for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77