Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NAHQ Exam CPHQ Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for NAHQ's CPHQ exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 5
[All CPHQ Questions]

A hand surgeon is referred for peer review for a case of a wrong-site surgery. Which of the following professionals would be the best choice as a member of the peer review committee?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Medication reconciliation is the process of identifying and resolving medication discrepancies to ensure that patients receive the correct medications. This process involves comparing the patient's current medications with new prescriptions, ensuring that there are no omissions, duplications, or interactions that could lead to adverse effects.

Steps in Medication Reconciliation: The process typically involves:

Collecting an accurate list of the patient's current medications (including prescription, over-the-counter, and herbal supplements).

Comparing this list with new medication orders or prescriptions.

Identifying discrepancies, such as omitted medications, incorrect dosages, or potentially harmful drug interactions.

Resolving these discrepancies by consulting with the prescribing physician, pharmacist, or other healthcare providers.

Comparison to Other Options:

B . creating a list of a patient's prescription medications: While creating a medication list is a part of the reconciliation process, the primary goal is to resolve discrepancies, not just to list medications.

C . monitoring patient adherence to medication regimens: Monitoring adherence is important, but it is not the primary focus of medication reconciliation.

D . sharing responsibility between pharmacy and nursing: While collaboration between pharmacy and nursing is essential, medication reconciliation is specifically about identifying and addressing discrepancies.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Maryln
17 days ago
But wouldn't the quality improvement coordinator with peer review experience also bring a different perspective to the committee?
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
19 days ago
I agree, the plastic surgeon would have the expertise to provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
25 days ago
I think the plastic surgeon with comparable training would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77