Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ISTQB-CTFL Topic 6 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ISTQB-CTFL exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 6

[All ISTQB-CTFL Questions]

For the same financial institution in Question 12, with the same requirements and expectations, what would be the most likely investment values used in testing if two-point boundary value analysis is used to design test cases specific to the 13% interest rate equivalence partition?

AR100 000, R100 001, R500 000, R500 001.

BR99 999, R100 000, R499 999, R500 000.

CR100 000. R500 000.

DR99 000, R500 001.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

For boundary value analysis, the test cases should include the boundary values just inside and just outside the equivalence partition for the 13% interest rate range:

R100,000 (just inside the previous range)

R100,001 (start of the 13% range)

R500,000 (end of the 13% range)

R500,001 (just outside the range)

These values ensure that both the edges of the partition are tested.

by Melita at Mar 08, 2025, 11:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISTQB-CTFL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Melodie

2 months ago

Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser. It's like they're trying to trip us up with all these financial shenanigans. Time to put on my thinking cap!

upvoted 0 times

Lauryn

21 days ago

D) R99 000, R500 001.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

1 months ago

C) R100 000. R500 000.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paz

1 months ago

B) R99 999, R100 000, R499 999, R500 000.

upvoted 0 times

...

Art

1 months ago

A) R100 000, R100 001, R500 000, R500 001.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Mila

2 months ago

D all the way, baby! Gotta keep 'em on their toes with some unexpected values. R99,000 and R500,001 are where it's at.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salome

2 months ago

I'd go with B. Hitting the sweet spot right on the boundary seems like the safest bet for this kind of financial institution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

2 months ago

C'mon, it's got to be A. Pushing the limits is where the real action is at! R100,001? Now that's what I call a test case.

upvoted 0 times

Talia

1 months ago

User 3: Yeah, A seems like the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

1 months ago

User 2: Agreed, R100,001 is definitely a test case worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kent

1 months ago

User 1: I think A is the way to go. Pushing the limits is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Sunny

2 months ago

I agree with Gary, A seems to be the most comprehensive option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

2 months ago

But A covers the range of values specified in the question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myong

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

3 months ago

I think the answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Orville

3 months ago

Hmm, I think the most likely values would be R99,999, R100,000, R499,999, and R500,000. Gotta hit those boundaries, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Pearly

2 months ago

Let's go with option B) for the test cases then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ling

2 months ago

Yes, option B) seems like the most likely choice for two-point boundary value analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melita

2 months ago

I think option B) R99 999, R100 000, R499 999, R500 000 covers those values.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederick

2 months ago

I agree, hitting those boundaries is crucial for testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77