Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ISTQB-CTFL Topic 1 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ISTQB-CTFL exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 1
[All ISTQB-CTFL Questions]

Which ONE of the following options is NOT a benefit of test automation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Test Management tools are designed to support the planning, execution, and monitoring of the testing process. They provide features for managing test cases, test runs, tracking defects, and reporting on testing activities. However, the statement in option C describes Test Management tools as monitoring and reporting on the system's behavior during testing activities, which is not accurate. Test Management tools focus on the testing process itself rather than on the behavior of the system under test.

Test data preparation tools (A) indeed create and manage test data for use during test execution.

Test execution tools (B) automate the execution of test cases and the comparison of actual outcomes against expected results.

Test comparators (D) are tools that compare actual outcomes with expected outcomes, highlighting discrepancies.

Therefore, option C is the correct answer as it inaccurately describes the function of Test Management tools.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lorita
1 months ago
Gotta go with B. Automation may be more consistent, but it can't match the nuanced, contextual understanding that a human tester brings to the table.
upvoted 0 times
Tom
11 days ago
I think a combination of both automation and manual testing is the way to go for a comprehensive testing strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
17 days ago
Automation is great for speeding up the process, but human testers provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
1 months ago
I agree, human testers can pick up on things that automation might miss.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colette
2 months ago
Ha! Eliminating manual testing entirely? That's like saying we can replace all human chefs with robots. Not happening anytime soon.
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
2 days ago
Ha! Eliminating manual testing entirely? That's like saying we can replace all human chefs with robots. Not happening anytime soon.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
1 months ago
C) Prevention of simple human errors
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
1 months ago
B) More objective assessment
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 months ago
A) Reduced test execution times
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
2 months ago
I think Option B is the correct answer. Test automation can actually introduce bias and be less objective than manual testing in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
2 months ago
Option D seems like a stretch. Test automation can never completely replace manual testing. There will always be some aspects that require human touch.
upvoted 0 times
Corrie
1 months ago
C) Prevention of simple human errors
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
1 months ago
B) More objective assessment
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
1 months ago
A) Reduced test execution times
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luther
2 months ago
I agree with Aileen, D) Eliminating completely the need for manual testing is not a benefit of test automation because manual testing is still required for some aspects like usability testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Eliminating completely the need for manual testing because some manual testing is still necessary for certain scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
2 months ago
I think the answer is D) Eliminating completely the need for manual testing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77