Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI Exam SPHR Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's SPHR exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All SPHR Questions]

As an HR Professional you must be familiar with particular labor-based acts of congress. One such act is the Taft-Hartley Act which addressed right-to-work states and unions. What does right-to-work states mean for unions and employees?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Answer option A is correct.

Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc. was referenced in the case of same-sex harassment brought to the Supreme Court in Oncale v. Sundowner (D). Oncalehelped determine that gender is of little consequence when harassment meets the statutory requirements defined in Harris. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (B) and Burlington Industries v. Ellerth (C) were also important cases aiding in interpreting the concept of sexual harassment in the workplace.

Chapter: Employee and Labor Relations

Objective: Review Questions


Contribute your Thoughts:

Helaine
2 months ago
I think the right-to-work law is like a hall pass for employees - they can choose to join the union or just take a bathroom break instead.
upvoted 0 times
Moira
12 days ago
D) An organization can fire employees if they're members of a union.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
15 days ago
That's right, it gives employees the choice to join or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 months ago
A) Employees are not required to join a union to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tran
2 months ago
Definitely option A. Employees should not be forced to join a union just to keep their job. That's like being forced to join a gym to use the treadmill!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
Wow, this is a tricky one! I heard that right-to-work states are like the Switzerland of the labor world - they're neutral ground where unions and employees can coexist peacefully.
upvoted 0 times
Heike
1 months ago
D) An organization can fire employees if they're members of a union.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
1 months ago
That's correct! Right-to-work states allow employees the choice to join a union or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
2 months ago
A) Employees are not required to join a union to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Toi
2 months ago
Right-to-work states mean that employees have the freedom to choose whether or not to join a union. This is a fundamental principle of individual liberty.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
29 days ago
Actually, in right-to-work states, unions do not have control over hiring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
1 months ago
C) Union conducts the hiring process for an organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
2 months ago
That's right, it gives employees the choice to join or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 months ago
A) Employees are not required to join a union to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adell
2 months ago
I believe that option A is correct because it allows employees to have more freedom in their decision to join a union.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
2 months ago
I agree with Shaniqua, it gives employees the choice to join a union or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
3 months ago
I think right-to-work states mean employees are not required to join a union to work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77