Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Developer Topic 16 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Developer exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 16
[All Professional Cloud Developer Questions]

Your company is planning to migrate their on-premises Hadoop environment to the cloud. Increasing storage cost and maintenance of data stored in HDFS is a major concern for your company. You also want to make minimal changes to existing data analytics jobs and existing architecture. How should you proceed with the migration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kristofer
2 months ago
Option A looks tempting, but I'm not sure BigQuery is the best fit for our existing Hadoop-based analytics jobs. Rewriting all those jobs seems like a lot of unnecessary work. Option D seems like the perfect balance of cost savings and minimal changes to our architecture.
upvoted 0 times
Rodolfo
6 days ago
Let's proceed with creating a Cloud Dataproc cluster and migrating our Hadoop code objects to the new cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
10 days ago
We should definitely consider moving our data to Cloud Storage and leveraging the Cloud Dataproc connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
17 days ago
Option D does seem like a good balance of cost savings and minimal changes to our architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
18 days ago
I agree, rewriting all those jobs for BigQuery does seem like a lot of unnecessary work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selene
2 months ago
Haha, Option B is a classic 'let's just throw more hardware at the problem' approach. I doubt our management would be too impressed with that strategy. We need a more strategic, cloud-focused solution like what's described in Option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
2 months ago
I'm a bit skeptical about Option C. Migrating HDFS data to larger HDD disks doesn't seem like it will address the core issue of high storage costs. We should look for a solution that truly optimizes our storage costs, like Option D.
upvoted 0 times
Mitzie
1 months ago
Yeah, moving our data to Cloud Storage and using the Cloud Dataproc connector sounds like a more efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
2 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like a better choice for optimizing storage costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
2 months ago
I prefer option D. Moving our data to Cloud Storage and using the Cloud Dataproc connector for running jobs seems like a more scalable solution for our company's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
2 months ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward approach. It allows us to keep our existing Hadoop code while migrating the data to the more cost-effective Cloud Storage. The Cloud Dataproc connector will make it easy to run our jobs on the new data location.
upvoted 0 times
Tyisha
1 months ago
Yes, it's important to find a solution that minimizes changes to our existing data analytics jobs and architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
1 months ago
We should definitely consider moving our data to Cloud Storage to save on storage costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
2 months ago
I agree, leveraging the Cloud Dataproc connector will definitely make it easier to run our jobs on the new data location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 months ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward approach. It allows us to keep our existing Hadoop code while migrating the data to the more cost-effective Cloud Storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Solange
2 months ago
I agree with Nathalie. Option C seems like the most efficient way to proceed with the migration while minimizing changes to our existing architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
2 months ago
I think option C sounds like a good plan. It allows us to migrate our Hadoop environment to Cloud Dataproc and save on storage costs by moving data to larger HDD disks.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77