Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Developer Topic 1 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Developer exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 1
[All Professional Cloud Developer Questions]

You manage an application that runs in a Compute Engine instance. You also have multiple backend services executing in stand-alone Docker containers running in Compute Engine instances. The Compute Engine instances supporting the backend services are scaled by managed instance groups in multiple regions. You want your calling application to be loosely coupled. You need to be able to invoke distinct service implementations that are chosen based on the value of an HTTP header found in the request. Which Google Cloud feature should you use to invoke the backend services?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

In
1 months ago
Service Directory for sure! It's the perfect solution for this use case. Plus, it's just fun to say 'Service Directory' - it's like a superhero name for your APIs!
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
15 hours ago
I think Traffic Director could also work well for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
4 days ago
I agree, Service Directory makes it easy to invoke different service implementations based on HTTP headers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
8 days ago
Service Directory is definitely the way to go. It's like having a superhero for your APIs!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rikki
2 months ago
Internal HTTP(S) Load Balancing could work, but it doesn't really address the dynamic service selection based on the HTTP header. I'd say Service Directory is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lon
1 months ago
C) Anthos Service Mesh
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 months ago
B) Service Directory
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
1 months ago
A) Traffic Director
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
Why do you think that? I thought Traffic Director would be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Anthos Service Mesh also seems like a good choice for managing and routing traffic to the backend services. But Service Directory might be the simpler solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Mitzie
2 months ago
Service Directory might be a simpler solution for invoking distinct service implementations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
2 months ago
I think Anthos Service Mesh could be a good option for managing traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mary
2 months ago
I think I'd go with Service Directory. It seems like the best option to decouple the calling application from the backend services and allow for dynamic service discovery based on the HTTP header.
upvoted 0 times
Andrew
21 days ago
D) Internal HTTP(S) Load Balancing
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
22 days ago
C) Anthos Service Mesh
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
1 months ago
B) Service Directory
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
2 months ago
A) Traffic Director
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catina
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Anthos Service Mesh.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Traffic Director.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77