Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Genesys Exam GE0-806 Topic 5 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Genesys's GE0-806 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 5
[All GE0-806 Questions]

Which are possible methods of WFM Server load balancing?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kerry
23 days ago
As a server admin, I always prefer a little 'host balancing' with a side of 'processor balancing' - it's the perfect combo, trust me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
28 days ago
Wait, is 'host balancing' a real thing? I'm just going to stick with the good old third-party load-balancer, D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Artie
7 days ago
I've heard of host balancing too, but I agree with you, D seems like the best choice for WFM Server load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
8 days ago
I agree, but I still prefer using a third-party load-balancer for more control and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
12 days ago
I think host balancing is a real method, it helps distribute the load across different servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
13 days ago
I think host balancing is a real thing, but I also prefer using a third-party load-balancer like option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karina
1 months ago
Oooh, memory balancing? I wonder if that's a thing. I'll go with C and D just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Floyd
11 hours ago
Yeah, C and D sound like good choices for WFM Server load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
11 days ago
I'll go with C and D just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
12 days ago
Yeah, those seem like safe choices for ensuring server performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
27 days ago
I think memory balancing is a thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
1 months ago
I agree, I also chose C and D for WFM Server load balancing methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
1 months ago
I think memory balancing is definitely a thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amber
1 months ago
A and D for sure! Processor balancing and a third-party load-balancer, can't go wrong with that combo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm thinking C and D are the way to go. Host balancing and a third-party load-balancer seem like the most logical options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
I would also consider C) Host balancing as a possible method. It's important to distribute the load evenly across servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
2 months ago
I agree with Ona. Processor balancing and Third-party load-balancer make sense for WFM Server load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
2 months ago
I think A) Processor balancing and D) Third-party load-balancer are possible methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
2 months ago
I'm not sure about Third-party load-balancer. I think C) Host balancing could also be a method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
I agree with Aja. Processor balancing and Third-party load-balancer make sense for WFM Server load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
2 months ago
I think A) Processor balancing and D) Third-party load-balancer are possible methods.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77