Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_NST-7.2 Topic 5 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_NST-7.2 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 5
[All NSE7_NST-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of a real-time debug.

Which statement about this output is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

IKE_SA_INIT Exchange:

The IKE_SA_INIT exchange is the first step in the IKEv2 negotiation process. It is responsible for setting up the initial security association (SA) and performing Diffie-Hellman key exchange.

During this exchange, the responder may employ various measures to protect against Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, such as rate limiting and the use of puzzles to increase the computational cost for an attacker.

DoS Protection Mechanisms:

One key method involves limiting the number of half-open SAs from any single IP address or subnet.

The IKE_SA_INIT exchange can also incorporate the use of stateless cookies, which help to verify the initiator's legitimacy without requiring extensive resource allocation by the responder until the initiator is verified.


RFC 5996: Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) (RFC Editor).

RFC 8019: Protecting Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Implementations from Distributed Denial-of-Service Attacks (IETF Datatracker).

Contribute your Thoughts:

Brunilda
1 months ago
Wait, is this a real-time debug or a real-time snooze? I could use a nap after staring at this output for too long!
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 months ago
Really? Option D about the category ID 255? I don't see any evidence of that in the output. Seems like a stretch to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
1 months ago
Hold on, the output indicates this web request was inspected using the rtgd-allow web filter profile, so option C seems to be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
1 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. The output mentions that the requested URL was found in the local cache, so I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
Carli
4 days ago
I'm not so sure, but I think option C might be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
5 days ago
User 3: I'm not so sure about that. The output mentions that the requested URL was found in the local cache, so I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
10 days ago
User 2: I believe FortiGate found the requested URL in its local cache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
12 days ago
User 1: I think the server hostname was extracted from the SNI in the client request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
15 days ago
I agree with you, option A seems to be the most accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
17 days ago
I think option A is correct. The server hostname was extracted from the SNI in the client request.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nikita
2 months ago
Hmm, I think option A is the correct answer. The output clearly shows the server hostname was extracted from the SNI in the client request.
upvoted 0 times
Tandra
17 days ago
User1: Great, looks like we all agree on option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
25 days ago
User3: That makes sense, option A it is then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, the output clearly indicates that the server hostname was extracted from the SNI in the client request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 months ago
User1: I agree, option A seems to be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C) This web request was inspected using the rtgd-allow web filter profile could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
2 months ago
I agree with Johnna, because the output shows information related to server hostname extraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) The server hostname was extracted from the SNI in the client request, or from the CN in the server certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77