Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam PT0-002 Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's PT0-002 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 5
[All PT0-002 Questions]

Which of the following assessment methods is MOST likely to cause harm to an ICS environment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

* System hardening involves securing a system by reducing its surface of vulnerability, which includes changing default credentials, disabling unnecessary services, and applying security patches.

* Details:

A . Password encryption: Secures passwords but does not address the issue of default credentials.

B . System hardening: Comprehensive approach to securing the system, including changing default credentials.

C . Multifactor authentication: Adds an additional layer of security but does not solve the problem of default credentials being enabled.

D . Patch management: Ensures software is up-to-date but does not directly address default credentials.

* Reference: System hardening is a fundamental practice in securing systems and preventing unauthorized access, as detailed in security best practices and guidelines.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Beatriz
1 months ago
Active scanning? More like active suicide, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 months ago
I don't know, man. Ping sweeps can be pretty disruptive. I once did one at work and the boss wasn't too happy about it.
upvoted 0 times
Silva
1 days ago
D) Packet analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
2 days ago
A) Active scanning
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
11 days ago
C) Protocol reversing
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
22 days ago
B) Ping sweep
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 months ago
A) Active scanning
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eulah
1 months ago
Packet analysis seems pretty harmless, right? I mean, it's just looking at the data, not messing with anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
2 months ago
Hmm, protocol reversing seems a bit risky too. I wonder if that could give an attacker too much insight into the system.
upvoted 0 times
Merrilee
2 days ago
D) Packet analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
12 days ago
C) Protocol reversing
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
27 days ago
B) Ping sweep
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
1 months ago
A) Active scanning
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daren
2 months ago
Active scanning definitely sounds the most dangerous. I'd be scared to try that on my ICS!
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
25 days ago
B) Ping sweep
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
1 months ago
Yeah, active scanning can definitely cause harm. It's too risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
1 months ago
A) Active scanning
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
2 months ago
I believe protocol reversing is also risky for an ICS environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
2 months ago
I agree, active scanning can disrupt the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
2 months ago
I think active scanning can cause harm.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77