Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam PT0-002 Topic 4 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's PT0-002 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 4
[All PT0-002 Questions]

Which of the following situations would MOST likely warrant revalidation of a previous security assessment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

* Deauthentication attacks can force legitimate users to disconnect from a wireless network, prompting them to reconnect and, in the process, capture valid user credentials using a rogue access point or network monitoring tools.

* Details:

A . Wardriving: Involves driving around to discover wireless networks; it does not directly gather user credentials.

B . Captive portal: Requires users to log in but is not an attack method; it is a legitimate method to control network access.

C . Deauthentication: Forces users to reauthenticate, allowing an attacker to capture credentials during the reconnection process.

D . Impersonation: Involves pretending to be someone else to gain access but is less effective for directly capturing user credentials compared to deauthentication.

* Reference: Deauthentication attacks are well-documented in wireless security assessments and penetration testing guides.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lenna
1 months ago
Hmm, let's see. A breach? Revalidation time! Merger or acquisition? Revalidation! Firewall changes? Revalidation! Basically, the answer is always revalidation. Security is like a hungry beast that must be constantly fed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 months ago
D? Seriously? Remediating vulnerabilities is great, but it's not a reason to slack off on security checks. Revalidation is a must.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
1 months ago
C, for sure. Firewall changes are a big deal, can't just assume everything's still secure. Gotta double-check, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Ellsworth
18 days ago
A) After detection of a breach
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
2 months ago
But what about C) When an organization updates its network firewall configurations? Wouldn't that also be a valid reason for revalidation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
2 months ago
I'm going with B. Mergers and acquisitions can really shake things up, so it's wise to revalidate security assessments then.
upvoted 0 times
Myra
1 months ago
Updating network firewall configurations is important too, but mergers and acquisitions can have a bigger impact on security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
1 months ago
I agree, mergers and acquisitions can introduce new risks that need to be assessed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannette
2 months ago
I agree with Elina, a breach would definitely warrant revalidation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
2 months ago
A! A breach is a huge red flag, definitely warrants a revalidation. Can't be too careful with security these days.
upvoted 0 times
Vicki
14 days ago
D) When most of the vulnerabilities have been remediated
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
15 days ago
C) When an organization updates its network firewall configurations
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
18 days ago
B) After a merger or an acquisition
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 months ago
A) After detection of a breach
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elina
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) After detection of a breach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77