Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L4M3 Topic 7 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M3 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 7
[All L4M3 Questions]

Southwark is negotiating a contract with Orchard to provide software and IT services. Orchard will manufacture and install the products which are contractually supplied by IBM. Southwark's procurement manager is worried that during the contract there would be some problems that they would not able to claim for damages from Orchard. Which of the following should be included in the head contract so that Southward can sue IBM, should the need arise?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Advantages of using fixed pricing arrangement are as below:

- Budget/income certainty - prices are fixed up front and should not change

- The impact of changes to the supplier's cost base is not fed through to the purchaser. If costs diminish, the supplier will benefit from this, and if costs rise, the purchaser will benefit


LO 3, AC 3.3

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tiera
2 months ago
Indemnity? More like 'in-dementia', amirite? These exam questions are really testing our sanity.
upvoted 0 times
Wayne
6 days ago
C) Collateral warranty deed
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
17 days ago
B) Indemnity
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
1 months ago
A) Negligence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
2 months ago
Negligence? What is this, a game of find the odd one out? Indemnity is the clear winner here, unless Southwark wants to roll the dice and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
Josphine
12 days ago
D) Insurance
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
15 days ago
C) Collateral warranty deed
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
16 days ago
B) Indemnity
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
1 months ago
A) Negligence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tomoko
2 months ago
Insurance? Really? That's like trying to put a band-aid on a broken leg. Indemnity is the way to go, hands down.
upvoted 0 times
Mona
9 days ago
D) Insurance
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
24 days ago
C) Collateral warranty deed
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
25 days ago
B) Indemnity
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
2 months ago
A) Negligence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lisha
2 months ago
I believe negligence should also be included, just to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the collateral warranty deed, that sounds a bit shady. Better stick with the classic indemnity clause.
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
1 months ago
Yeah, it's better to have that protection in place just in case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
2 months ago
I agree, the indemnity clause is a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
2 months ago
I agree with Twana. Indemnity will protect us in case of any damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
Indemnity seems like the obvious choice here. If Southwark can't claim damages from Orchard, they need a way to go after IBM directly.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
22 days ago
D) Insurance
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
1 months ago
C) Collateral warranty deed
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
2 months ago
B) Indemnity
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
2 months ago
A) Negligence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Twana
3 months ago
I think we should include indemnity in the head contract.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77