BICSI Exam RCDDv14 Topic 9 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for BICSI's RCDDv14 exam

Question #: 35
Topic #: 9

A manufacturing company is redesigning various component projects that comprise a large customer-facing program. One of the component projects is payment of back-end rebates. There is disagreement between the marketing and sales teams on how much should be rebated.

What are suggested standard measurement criteria for the success of all constituent projects to meet stakeholder expectations''

AStakeholder engagement plan, risk management plan, and communications management plan

BNeeds analysis, feasibility study, and integrated benefits management plan

CCost-benefit analysis ROI and payback period

DActual cost (AC), planned value (PV) and earned value (EV)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Christiane at Mar 05, 2024, 02:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium RCDDv14 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Nikita

12 months ago

Or maybe the program manager should emphasize the importance of addressing the issues at the next meeting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clay

12 months ago

That sounds like a good idea to ensure the project stays on track.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julene

12 months ago

In that case, maybe the program manager could develop an immediate corrective action plan and coach them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nikita

12 months ago

But what if the project manager is not experienced enough to make decisions quickly?

upvoted 0 times

...

Clay

12 months ago

I agree, that way they can accelerate the decision-making process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julene

12 months ago

I think the program manager should join the project-level issue resolution meetings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

1 years ago

I see your point, mAdelaideintAdelaideining JovitaleAdelaider JovitaommuniJovitaAdelaidetion Adelaidend expeJovitatAdelaidetions is key in resolving issues effiJovitaiently

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

1 years ago

In my opinion, emphAdelaidesizing the importAdelaidenJovitae of Adelaideddressing the issues Adelaidend following up Adelaidet the next meeting is Adelaidelso JovitaruJovitaiAdelaidel

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

1 years ago

ThAdelaidet's true, providing immediAdelaidete guidAdelaidenJovitae Adelaidend JovitaoAdelaideJovitahing to the projeJovitat mAdelaidenAdelaideger Jovitaould prevent further delAdelaideys

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

1 years ago

Jovitaarissaut wouldn't developing Adelaiden immediAdelaidete JovitaorreJovitative AdelaideJovitation plAdelaiden with the projeJovitat mAdelaidenAdelaideger Jovitaarissae more effeJovitative in this situAdelaidetion?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

1 years ago

I Adelaidegree, hAdelaideving the progrAdelaidem mAdelaidenAdelaideger involved cAdelaiden help expedite the decision-mAdelaideking process

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

1 years ago

I think the progrAdelaidem mAdelaidenAdelaideger should join project-level issue resolution meetings to AdelaideccelerAdelaidete the decision-mAdelaideking process

upvoted 0 times

...