Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SAA-C03 Topic 3 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAA-C03 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 3
[All SAA-C03 Questions]

A company uses Amazon EC2 instances and Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) to run its self-managed database The company has 350 TB of data spread across all EBS volumes. The company takes daily EBS snapshots and keeps the snapshots for 1 month. The dally change rate is 5% of the EBS volumes.

Because of new regulations, the company needs to keep the monthly snapshots for 7 years. The company needs to change its backup strategy to comply with the new regulations and to ensure that data is available with minimal administrative effort.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This solution meets the requirements most cost-effectively because it enables the company to migrate its on-premises NFS data store to AWS without changing the existing applications or workflows. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides seamless and secure integration between on-premises and AWS storage. Amazon S3 File Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a file interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. By setting up an Amazon S3 File Gateway, the company can store and retrieve files as objects in Amazon S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS. The company can also use an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to automatically transition the data to the appropriate storage class based on the frequency of access and the cost of storage. For example, the company can use S3 Standard for frequently accessed data, S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) or S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) for less frequently accessed data, and S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive for long-term archival data.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a block interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. Volume Gateway is not suitable for migrating an NFS data store, as it requires attaching the volumes to EC2 instances or on-premises servers using the iSCSI protocol. Option C is not a valid solution because Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is a fully managed elastic NFS file system that is designed for workloads that require high availability, scalability, and performance. Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files, with a lower price per GB and a higher price per access. Using Amazon EFS Standard-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. Option D is not a valid solution because Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files that do not require the availability and durability of Amazon EFS Standard or Standard-IA. Amazon EFS One Zone-IA stores data in a single Availability Zone, which reduces the cost by 47% compared to Amazon EFS Standard-IA, but also increases the risk of data loss in the event of an Availability Zone failure. Using Amazon EFS One Zone-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. It would also compromise the availability and durability of the data.


AWS Storage Gateway - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 File Gateway - AWS Storage Gateway

Object Lifecycle Management - Amazon Simple Storage Service

[AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway - AWS Storage Gateway]

[Amazon Elastic File System - Amazon Web Services]

[Using EFS storage classes - Amazon Elastic File System]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alica
1 months ago
I'm going with Option A. It's the simplest and most cost-effective solution, and it'll keep my data safe for the next 7 years. Now, if only I could find a way to get my boss to pay for my AWS certification...
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
12 days ago
Option A sounds like the way to go. It's cost-effective and will keep our data safe for 7 years.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashley
1 months ago
Option D seems a bit overkill. Using EBS direct APIs to take monthly snapshots and storing them in Amazon S3 Infrequent Access might be more complicated than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
1 months ago
Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure if the incremental snapshots will be enough to meet the new regulations. It's always better to err on the side of caution when it comes to data retention.
upvoted 0 times
Tiera
3 days ago
Let's go with Option A to ensure we comply with the new regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
10 days ago
I agree, Option A allows for easy management of monthly snapshots for 7 years.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
13 days ago
Option A seems like the best choice for long-term data retention.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fernanda
2 months ago
I'm not convinced that Option B is the best choice. Moving the monthly snapshots to Amazon EBS Snapshots Archive might not be as cost-effective as using Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive.
upvoted 0 times
Ricki
3 days ago
I agree, using Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive for long-term storage of monthly snapshots would be more cost-effective than Amazon EBS Snapshots Archive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
4 days ago
Option B is to move the monthly snapshots to Amazon EBS Snapshots Archive after 30 days. It might not be the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
8 days ago
Option A is to create an Amazon S3 lifecycle policy to move the monthly snapshots to Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 30 days. This will save costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brianne
2 months ago
But option A includes moving the monthly snapshot to Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive, which is cheaper in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most cost-effective solution. Storing the monthly snapshots in Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive for 7 years is a great way to minimize storage costs while ensuring long-term data retention.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
1 months ago
I agree, using Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive for long-term storage is a smart move to comply with the new regulations and minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 months ago
Option A seems like the most cost-effective solution. Storing the monthly snapshots in Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive for 7 years is a great way to minimize storage costs while ensuring long-term data retention.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77