Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam SAA-C03 Topic 2 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAA-C03 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 2
[All SAA-C03 Questions]

A company uses NFS to store large video files in on-premises network attached storage. Each video file ranges in size from 1MB to 500 GB. The total storage is 70 TB and is no longer growing. The company decides to migrate the video files to Amazon S3. The company must migrate the video files as soon as possible while using the least possible network bandwidth.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

AWS Outposts is a fully managed service that delivers AWS infrastructure and services to virtually any on-premises or edge location for a consistent hybrid experience. AWS Outposts supports Amazon EKS, which is a managed service that makes it easy to run Kubernetes on AWS and on-premises. By installing an AWS Outposts rack in the company's data center, the company can run containers in a Kubernetes environment using Amazon EKS and other AWS managed services, while keeping the data locally in the company's data center and meeting the compliance requirements. AWS Outposts also provides a seamless connection to the local AWS Region for access to a broad range of AWS services.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Local Zones are not deployed in the company's data center, but in large metropolitan areas closer to end users. AWS Local Zones are owned, managed, and operated by AWS, and they provide low-latency access to the public internet and the local AWS Region. Option B is not a valid solution because AWS Snowmobile is a service that transports exabytes of data to AWS using a 45-foot long ruggedized shipping container pulled by a semi-trailer truck. AWS Snowmobile is not designed for running containers or AWS managed services on-premises, but for large-scale data migration. Option D is not a valid solution because AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized is a device that provides 80 TB of HDD or 210 TB of NVMe storage capacity for data transfer and edge computing. AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized does not support Amazon EKS or other AWS managed services, and it is not suitable for running containers in a Kubernetes environment.


AWS Outposts - Amazon Web Services

Amazon EKS on AWS Outposts - Amazon EKS

AWS Local Zones - Amazon Web Services

AWS Snowmobile - Amazon Web Services

[AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized - Amazon Web Services]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Afton
1 months ago
Wait, so I can't just use my neighbor's WiFi to transfer all this data? Dang, there goes my brilliant plan!
upvoted 0 times
Lavonna
16 days ago
User 1: You can use AWS Snowball to transfer the data to Amazon S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lourdes
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards the S3 File Gateway with Direct Connect option. That way, we can take advantage of the faster network connection and minimize the impact on the existing NFS infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
Essie
4 days ago
Let's go with that solution then, it seems like the best option for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
6 days ago
Agreed, it will help us migrate the video files quickly with minimal impact on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
10 days ago
S3 File Gateway with Direct Connect sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Almeta
1 months ago
Haha, can you imagine trying to transfer 70 TB of data using the AWS CLI? That would take forever! I think we need a more scalable solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
2 months ago
Hmm, the Snowball Edge option sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if it's the most efficient for a migration this size. I wonder if the S3 File Gateway might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
2 months ago
The S3 File Gateway might be a better choice for efficiency in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
2 months ago
I think the Snowball Edge option could work well for this migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luke
2 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one! I'm not sure if I can choose the best solution here. I'll need to really analyze the requirements and the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
1 months ago
User 4: DataSync can help optimize the transfer process and minimize the impact on network bandwidth. It's worth looking into.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
1 months ago
User 3: Another option could be using AWS DataSync to transfer the files incrementally to Amazon S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 months ago
User 2: That's a good idea! Snowball can help transfer large amounts of data quickly without using much network bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
2 months ago
User 1: Have you considered using AWS Snowball to transfer the large video files to Amazon S3?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option B. I think option D might be better because setting up an AWS Direct Connect connection can provide a dedicated network connection for transferring the files to Amazon S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
3 months ago
I agree with Kimberlie. Option B seems like the most efficient way to migrate the video files quickly. It's important to minimize the impact on our network during the transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
3 months ago
I think option B is the best solution. Using AWS Snowball Edge will help us transfer the large video files to Amazon S3 without consuming too much network bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77