Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

XML Exam I10-003 Topic 8 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for XML's I10-003 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 8
[All I10-003 Questions]

Assume that you wish to create an XML Schema document against which [XML Document] (referenced in a separate window) is valid.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hmm, option C has a typo in the namespace declaration. I'd avoid that one. B or D seem like the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
24 hours ago
I'm leaning towards option D. The 'choice' element gives more flexibility in handling the 'division' and 'title' elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
5 days ago
Option A looks good too, but I'm not sure if allowing any namespace is a good idea. B seems more controlled and specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
14 days ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option A is more flexible in terms of namespace validation. It ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the XML Schema document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
14 days ago
I think option B is the correct answer. It allows for any other elements from other namespaces, while still requiring the 'tns:person' element to be present.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
20 days ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct choice as it specifies a different namespace for the 'any' element and also allows for unbounded occurrences of 'person'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
22 days ago
I think option A is correct because it allows any namespace and has an unbounded occurrence of the 'person' element.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77