XML Exam I10-003 Topic 8 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for XML's I10-003 exam

Question #: 35
Topic #: 8

Assume that you wish to create an XML Schema document against which [XML Document] (referenced in a separate window) is valid.

A<xs:sequence>
<xs:any namespace='##any' processContents='lax'/>
<xs:element ref='tns:person' maxOccurs='unbounded'/>
</xs:sequence>

B<xs:sequence>
<xs:any namespace='##other' minOccurs='0' maxOccurs='unbounded'
processContents='lax'/>
<xs:element ref='tns:person' maxOccurs='unbounded'/>
</xs:sequence>

C<xs:sequence>
<xs:any namespace-'urn:xmlmaster: division urn:xmlmaster:title'
processContents='lax'/>
<xs:element ref='tns:person' maxOccurs='unbounded'/>
</xs:sequence>

D<xs:choice minOccurs='0' maxOccurs='unbounded'>
<xs:any namespace='urrrxmlmaster:division um:xmlmaster:title'
processContents='lax'/>
<xs:element ref='tns:person'/>
</xs:choice>

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, F

by Joni at Mar 07, 2024, 09:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium I10-003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mirta

30 days ago

Option B - the 'any' element with 'lax' processing is a classic move. Gotta love that flexible schema design!

upvoted 0 times

Gail

14 days ago

User2: Yeah, it allows for more flexibility in the schema design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefanie

18 days ago

User1: I think option B with 'any' element and 'lax' processing is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

2 months ago

This question is making my head spin! I'm going to go with option B and hope for the best. XML schemas can be tricky.

upvoted 0 times

Mica

20 days ago

User3: I'm not sure about XML schemas, but option B sounds like a good option based on your reasoning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

1 months ago

User2: I agree, XML schemas can be tricky to work with. Option B seems like a safe bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

1 months ago

User1: I think option B is a good choice. XML schemas can be confusing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

2 months ago

Hmm, option C has a typo in the namespace declaration. I'd avoid that one. B or D seem like the best options here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

2 months ago

I'm leaning towards option D. The 'choice' element gives more flexibility in handling the 'division' and 'title' elements.

upvoted 0 times

Lynsey

1 months ago

True, option A could be a straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

1 months ago

I think option A might be simpler to implement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

1 months ago

I agree, the 'choice' element allows for different possibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

2 months ago

Option D seems like a good choice for flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilbert

2 months ago

Option A looks good too, but I'm not sure if allowing any namespace is a good idea. B seems more controlled and specific.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

2 months ago

That's a valid point, but I still think option A is more flexible in terms of namespace validation. It ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the XML Schema document.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

2 months ago

I think option B is the correct answer. It allows for any other elements from other namespaces, while still requiring the 'tns:person' element to be present.

upvoted 0 times

Micah

1 months ago

I think option B is the best because it allows for elements from other namespaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aide

1 months ago

I agree, option B seems to be the most flexible choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslie

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option B is the correct choice as it specifies a different namespace for the 'any' element and also allows for unbounded occurrences of 'person'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

3 months ago

I think option A is correct because it allows any namespace and has an unbounded occurrence of the 'person' element.

upvoted 0 times

...