Which of the following does not correctly describe the merits of adopting a standard language such as XBRL or NewsML when transmitting XML data between two different companies?
Okay, this is easy. Option D is clearly the answer. It's like saying 'just slap it together, it'll be fine.' That's not how the real world works, folks.
Ah, I see what they're going for. Option D is the only one that doesn't make sense. 'No need to consider performance'? Yeah, right, and unicorns are real.
Wait, so we're supposed to choose the option that doesn't describe the merits? That's like asking me to pick the least tasty chocolate from a box of truffles.
D) Since the language design has already placed a premium on performance, there will be no need to consider performance tuning during system development
B) If there is an application package product available, a cost comparison can be made between purchasing the package or developing the application in-house to make the most cost-effective selection
Jettie
2 months agoErick
20 days agoStephen
1 months agoShaun
1 months agoEssie
2 months agoTayna
2 months agoJacquline
2 months agoLacey
20 days agoTy
25 days agoQuiana
26 days agoLajuana
1 months agoOmer
2 months agoElouise
2 months agoOmer
2 months agoKimi
2 months agoRobt
30 days agoChery
1 months agoShawana
1 months agoHildegarde
1 months agoNoah
2 months agoSusy
2 months ago