Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 5V0-61.22 Topic 8 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-61.22 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 8
[All 5V0-61.22 Questions]

An administrator of iOS supervised devices has noticed that devices are checking in regularly but are failing the Last Compromised Scan compliance policy. The administrator is fine with having slight disruptions to users but does not want any interaction from the user to be required.

The administrator decides to use an action in the Last Compromised Scan compliance policy that would force the device to report back the compromised status without requiring user input.

Which action m the Last Compromised Scan compliance policy should be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Leonie
5 days ago
Option D is the way to go, man. Compliance profiles are like the Swiss Army knife of iOS management - they can do it all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
6 days ago
I'd go with option B. Requesting a device check-in is like asking your dog to fetch the newspaper - it just works. No muss, no fuss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
10 days ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach. Assigning a sensor to the device should do the job without any fuss. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
16 days ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D. Assigning a compliance profile with a single app payload could be the way to go. Might as well kill two birds with one stone, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
22 days ago
But wouldn't assigning a sensor to the device be more effective in this situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
24 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Assign a push notification to the device to request the compromised status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
26 days ago
Option C looks like the easiest solution. A push notification to the device to get the status? Sounds like a breeze!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
28 days ago
I think option B is the way to go. Requesting a device check-in should do the trick without any user interaction. Nice and efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 months ago
I think the answer is B) Assign the command to Request Device Check-In.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77