Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 5V0-61.22 Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-61.22 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All 5V0-61.22 Questions]

A customer has asked for recommendations around a disaster recovery architecture design for VMware Workspace ONE Access. The customer has an extremely aggressive recovery point objective and recovery time objective.

Which HA/DR design should be recommended, given the supported options?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Edmond
2 months ago
Personally, I'd go with option B. It's simpler to set up and maintain, and the customer is looking for a quick recovery. Who needs redundancy when you can just fail over to the other site, right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Katlyn
5 days ago
I agree, simplicity is important when dealing with aggressive recovery objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
6 days ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. Quick recovery is key in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Isn't option B the same as option C, just with a different description? Why would we need two separate active/active setups?
upvoted 0 times
Leana
24 days ago
The choice between the two would depend on factors like network latency, data replication, and failover requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
1 months ago
Option B has separate active/active setups in each datacenter, while option C has nodes spanned across both datacenters in an active/active configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
1 months ago
Option B and C may seem similar, but the key difference lies in how the nodes are distributed across the datacenters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laine
2 months ago
I'm not entirely convinced. Option D might be a more robust solution, with an active/passive setup. That way, we have a dedicated failover site ready to take over in case of disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Pura
1 months ago
Let's go with Option D for the disaster recovery architecture design.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
1 months ago
I agree, having an active/passive setup provides a dedicated failover site for quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
2 months ago
I think Option D is the best choice for our aggressive recovery objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giuseppe
2 months ago
That's a good point, option C does offer more redundancy. I see your perspective now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
2 months ago
Option C looks like the best fit for the customer's requirements. Active/active configuration with nodes spanning both datacenters ensures high availability and quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
Kendra
1 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
1 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vincent
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be more suitable because it provides better redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77