Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 2V0-33.22 Topic 5 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-33.22 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 5
[All 2V0-33.22 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Osvaldo
2 months ago
Leave it to the cloud admin to find the perfect solution. As long as they don't try to hack the hypervisor with a toaster, I'm good with whatever they decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
2 months ago
I'm not sure why we would need to add i3.metal or i3en.metal hosts. The c4.metal seems like the appropriate host type for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Ira
1 days ago
A: Adding 16 CPU cores to the existing hosts might not be enough to meet the increased demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
3 days ago
B: I agree, that seems like the best choice to meet the demand for more cores and memory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
10 days ago
Adding 16 CPU cores to the existing hosts might not be enough to meet the demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
11 days ago
A: I think we should go with option B and add three c4.metal hosts to the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
1 months ago
Agreed, c4.metal hosts would provide the necessary capacity increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
1 months ago
I think adding three c4.metal hosts to the cluster would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elise
2 months ago
B looks like the best option. Adding three c4.metal hosts should give us the additional 60 cores and 640 GB of memory we need.
upvoted 0 times
Jenifer
7 days ago
I agree, adding multiple hosts seems like the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
10 days ago
D) Add one i3en.metal host to the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
11 days ago
Adding hosts might be a more efficient solution in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
13 days ago
A) Add 16 CPU cores to the existing hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
24 days ago
I think B is a better choice since it provides the exact resources needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 months ago
C) Add two i3.metal hosts to the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
1 months ago
That makes sense. It would definitely meet the demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
2 months ago
B) Add three c4.metal hosts to the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scot
3 months ago
But wouldn't adding more hosts increase the management overhead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
3 months ago
Adding 16 CPU cores to the existing hosts doesn't seem like the right solution. We need to add more physical hosts to the cluster to meet the increased demand.
upvoted 0 times
Chau
1 months ago
D) Add one i3en.metal host to the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
2 months ago
Adding more physical hosts is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
2 months ago
C) Add two i3.metal hosts to the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
2 months ago
B) Add three c4.metal hosts to the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marquetta
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe adding three c4.metal hosts to the cluster would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
3 months ago
I think we should add 16 CPU cores to the existing hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77