Chat now

Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 0d 3h 31m 1s Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 1V0-21.20 Topic 4 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 1V0-21.20 exam

Question #: 77
Topic #: 4

[All 1V0-21.20 Questions]

An administrator would like to enable a switch setting to restrict the network bandwidth that is available to ports, but the solution must also allow bursts of traffic to flow through at higher speeds. Which vSphere Distributed Switch setting accomplishes this goal?

AMonitoring

BSecurity

CTraffic shaping

DTeaming and failover

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Elin at Jun 29, 2024, 06:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1V0-21.20 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dorothy

11 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) Teaming and failover could also be a possibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devorah

11 months ago

I agree with Elliott, because traffic shaping can control bandwidth and allow bursts of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

11 months ago

Hmm, C) Traffic shaping seems to be the winner here. I can already picture the administrator setting that up with a smile on their face.

upvoted 0 times

Crista

10 months ago

Yes, it allows for controlling the bandwidth while still allowing bursts of traffic. Smart choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Farrah

10 months ago

I agree, C) Traffic shaping is the way to go for that scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Elliott

11 months ago

I think the answer is C) Traffic shaping.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

11 months ago

Definitely C) Traffic shaping. It's the only option that mentions 'restricting bandwidth' and 'allowing bursts of traffic'.

upvoted 0 times

Isaiah

10 months ago

Security and Teaming and failover are not related to bandwidth restrictions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

10 months ago

Monitoring wouldn't accomplish both goals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madonna

10 months ago

Yes, I agree. It allows for restricting bandwidth but also allows bursts of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

11 months ago

I think it's C) Traffic shaping.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Ilona

12 months ago

I'd go with C) Traffic shaping. Sounds like the perfect solution to control bandwidth while allowing bursts of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

Scarlet

11 months ago

I think C) Traffic shaping is the way to go too. It allows for control over bandwidth while still allowing bursts of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emeline

11 months ago

I agree, C) Traffic shaping seems like the best option for that scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77

a