B and D for sure. Although, I have to admit, the idea of using a service template as a 'post-staging' thing is kind of amusing. Like, 'Oops, forgot to configure this thing. Quick, fire up the service template!'
B and D are the obvious choices here. Although, I have to say, applying a non-identical configuration to multiple CPEs sounds more like a 'custom service' than a 'template'.
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Applying a non-identical service configuration to multiple CPEs doesn't really fit the definition of a 'template', does it? I'd go with B and D.
B and D seem like the most reasonable options here. I can see how a service template could be used to apply the same QoS configuration to multiple CPEs, and to share an identical service configuration across tenants.
Lisandra
1 months agoBettyann
2 days agoKayleigh
5 days agoJerlene
16 days agoVelda
1 months agoKassandra
1 months agoDexter
9 days agoLeah
25 days agoGlen
29 days agoMelvin
2 months agoEttie
5 days agoShonda
6 days agoLashunda
17 days agoYoulanda
2 months agoLea
19 days agoCruz
1 months agoShawn
2 months agoNana
2 months agoDorethea
2 months agoAileen
3 months agoJacquelyne
3 months ago