VEEAM Exam VMCE2021 Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for VEEAM's VMCE2021 exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 1

[All VMCE2021 Questions]

A Veeam administrator has been tasked to create a backup that will automatically make a copy of data on a different media type, while also being off site, without creating additional backup or backup copy jobs. The administrator has determined that a Scale-out Backup Repository can be used as part of the solution. How can this be accomplished?

AAdd a capacity tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Move' option.

BAdd an archive tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable 'GFS Tiering'.

CAdd an archive tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Copy' option.

DAdd a capacity tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Copy' option.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/backup/vsphere/capacity_tier_copy.html?ver=120

by Laurel at Jul 05, 2024, 07:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium VMCE2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Omer

10 months ago

I vote for option E: Hire a carrier pigeon to manually deliver the backups to the offsite location. Old-school, but it gets the job done!

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

11 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B, but I'd have to double-check the Veeam documentation to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

Odelia

10 months ago

After reviewing the documentation, it looks like the correct option is actually A. We need to add a capacity tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Move' option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

10 months ago

I agree, 'GFS Tiering' does sound like it would accomplish the task of making a copy of the data on a different media type. Let's double-check the documentation to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

10 months ago

I think B is the correct option. It mentions enabling 'GFS Tiering' which sounds like it would create a copy of the data on a different media type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenna

11 months ago

D is my pick. Copying to a capacity tier is probably the easiest solution here.

upvoted 0 times

Azzie

10 months ago

That's a good point, but I still think D is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Idella

10 months ago

I'm not sure, I think adding an archive tier with the 'Copy' option could also work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisandra

10 months ago

I agree, copying to a capacity tier seems like the most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Garry

10 months ago

I think D is the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rocco

11 months ago

I think both options could work, but enabling 'GFS Tiering' in an archive tier might provide better long-term storage capabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

11 months ago

But wouldn't enabling the 'Move' option in a capacity tier also achieve the same result?

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Add an archive tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable 'GFS Tiering'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

11 months ago

I think the answer is A) Add a capacity tier to the Scale-out Backup Repository and enable the 'Move' option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zena

11 months ago

I'd go with C. The 'Copy' option on the archive tier sounds like it would create the offsite backup we need.

upvoted 0 times

Mari

11 months ago

Yeah, that makes sense. It would create a copy of the data on a different media type and keep it off site.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiana

11 months ago

I think C is the way to go. The 'Copy' option on the archive tier should do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

12 months ago

Option B seems like the way to go. 'GFS Tiering' on an archive tier should get the job done without any extra work.

upvoted 0 times

Eliz

10 months ago

Definitely, it's a smart way to ensure data is copied to a different media type without much manual effort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Van

11 months ago

Adding an archive tier and enabling 'GFS Tiering' does sound like a simple solution for off-site backups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elizabeth

11 months ago

It definitely seems like the most efficient way to automatically make a copy of data on a different media type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

11 months ago

I agree, using 'GFS Tiering' on an archive tier sounds like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elmira

11 months ago

I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to achieve the task without creating extra jobs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chau

11 months ago

Option B does sound like the best choice. 'GFS Tiering' should handle the off-site copy automatically.

upvoted 0 times

...