Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VEEAM Exam VMCE2021 Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for VEEAM's VMCE2021 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 1
[All VMCE2021 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shenika
2 months ago
Option A sounds good in theory, but I'd be worried about the potential performance issues with a direct backup over that kind of network. C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
1 months ago
Using WAN accelerators for a backup copy job locally sounds like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
1 months ago
I think option C is the best approach in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 months ago
I agree, option A might have performance issues. Option C seems like a safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
2 months ago
Ha! Option B is a classic case of 'throwing more hardware at the problem.' I'd stick with the simpler and more cost-effective solution of option C.
upvoted 0 times
Leoma
4 days ago
Adjusting compression and deduplication settings could also help optimize the backup process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
13 days ago
Yeah, throwing more hardware at the problem isn't always the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
18 days ago
I agree, using WAN accelerators for a backup copy job seems like a smart choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
28 days ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Keep it simple and cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 months ago
Definitely option C for me. Who wants to deal with the hassle of setting up extra WAN accelerators when you can just do a local backup first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
2 months ago
I would go with option D. Adjusting the compression and deduplication settings could help optimize the backup process and reduce the impact on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 months ago
I prefer adjusting the compression and deduplication settings for this job. It can also help in avoiding disruptions during the backup process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
2 months ago
Option C seems the most logical choice here. Making a local backup and then using WAN accelerators for the backup copy job should help minimize disruptions on the high-latency, low-bandwidth network.
upvoted 0 times
Tamesha
1 months ago
User 2: Agreed, making a local backup first and then using WAN accelerators for the backup copy job sounds like a practical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
1 months ago
Adjusting the compression and deduplication settings could also make a difference in the backup process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
1 months ago
It's important to find ways to work around the limitations of the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
1 months ago
User 1: I think option C is the best solution for avoiding disruptions during backup over a high-latency, low bandwidth network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
2 months ago
Using WAN accelerators for the backup copy job can definitely help with the disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best solution in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
2 months ago
I agree with Lamonica. It will reduce disruptions to the backup process over a high-latency, low bandwidth network link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
2 months ago
I think the best option is to make a backup locally and then use WAN accelerators for a backup copy job.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77