Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

UiPath Exam UiPath-SAIv1 Topic 11 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-SAIv1 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 11
[All UiPath-SAIv1 Questions]

For an analytics use case, what are the recommended minimum model performance requirements in UiPath Communications Mining?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alayna
1 months ago
I dunno, this question seems a bit... snooty. Do we really need Excellent everything? Good enough should be good enough, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Elli
11 days ago
I think we should aim for 'Good' or better model ratings and individual performance factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nana
1 months ago
D all the way! Gotta have that Excellent model rating and individual performance factors. Anything less is just not good enough.
upvoted 0 times
Sherron
9 days ago
User 3: D all the way! We need top-notch performance for our analytics use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
13 days ago
User 2: Definitely, we can't settle for anything less than Excellent in both model rating and individual performance factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
18 days ago
User 1: I agree, D is the way to go. We need that Excellent rating.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
2 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. Excellent individual performance factors are probably the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
19 days ago
B could work too, but D offers the highest level of performance with excellent ratings across the board.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
25 days ago
I agree, D seems like the most reliable choice for meeting the minimum model performance requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
1 months ago
I think D is the best option. Excellent model ratings and individual performance factors are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jolene
2 months ago
Option C looks good to me. Gotta go for that Excellent model rating!
upvoted 0 times
Jody
9 hours ago
I think having individual performance factors rated as 'Good' or better is important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
18 days ago
I agree, aiming for an Excellent model rating is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenny
2 months ago
But wouldn't having both model ratings and individual performance factors rated as 'Excellent' be the best option for an analytics use case?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the model ratings should be 'Excellent' and individual performance factors rated as 'Good' or better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
3 months ago
I think the recommended minimum model performance requirements should be Model Ratings of 'Good' or better and individual performance factors rated as 'Good' or better.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77