Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

UiPath Exam UiPath-ASAPv1 Topic 1 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-ASAPv1 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 1
[All UiPath-ASAPv1 Questions]

Consider a process that is scheduled to run 3 times a day (9AM, 1PM, 6PM). For each run, the process needs to consume data from a different queue.

What is the best way to implement this functionality?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In UiPath Unassisted Task Mining, the correct type of licensing to check for running analysis is whether the customer has Mining units allocated. Task Mining uses AI algorithms to analyze user interactions and identify automation opportunities. Mining units are a specific type of licensing metric used to quantify and allocate the resources required for the Task Mining analysis. These units are consumed based on the volume of data analyzed and the computational resources utilized during the process. Ensuring the availability of Mining units is essential for the successful execution of Task Mining projects.


UiPath Task Mining Guide: Introduction to Task Mining

UiPath Licensing Guide: Understanding Licensing

Contribute your Thoughts:

Veronica
5 days ago
I heard the developers were debating whether to use the queue name as an argument or to just throw darts at the keyboard and hope for the best. Either way, it's sure to be a wild ride!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
9 days ago
Option D seems like a reasonable approach. Storing the queue name in a configuration file and sharing it? Sounds like a good way to keep things centralized and maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
16 hours ago
Option D seems like a reasonable approach. Storing the queue name in a configuration file and sharing it? Sounds like a good way to keep things centralized and maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emerson
21 days ago
Option C? Really? Publishing the process three times in Orchestrator just to specify the queue? That's a bit overkill, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Zita
3 days ago
A) Use the queue name as an argument for the process and set its value when creating the triggers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirk
30 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Option B. Maintaining an asset and updating it after each run seems like it could get messy. Let's keep things simple, shall we?
upvoted 0 times
Marylou
12 days ago
A) Use the queue name as an argument for the process and set its value when creating the triggers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fredric
1 months ago
Option A sounds like the simplest and most straightforward approach. I can just pass the queue name as an argument and set it when creating the triggers. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
1 months ago
I see your point, Lewis. But I think option C could also work well if we want to keep things organized in Orchestrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient because it centralizes the queue name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 months ago
I think option A is the best way to implement this functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a