UiPath Exam UiPath-ARDv1 Topic 5 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-ARDv1 exam

Question #: 63
Topic #: 5

A developer has created a process that gathers a listing of stock market prices in the following format _USD ().

How should the third line in RegEx Builder be modified to ensure that only items with prices of at least 100 are identified?

ARegEx: One of
Value: 123456789
Quantifiers: Between 2 and 4

BRegEx: Any word character
Value: \w
Quantifiers: Exactly 3

CRegEx: Digit
Value: \d
Quantifiers: Exactly 3
(Correct)
D.
RegEx: Literal
Value: [0-9]
Quantifiers: At least one (1 or more)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Retry Scope condition can be one of the activities that return a boolean. Even though the Path Exists activity also returns a Boolean value, it cannot be used in Retry Scope, it is an exception.

Instead of using Path Exists activity, you can use a Check True activity and as a condition placeSystem.IO.File.Exists(filepath).

UiPath Documentation

UiPath Forum

Exam Topic:Identify and describe the use of the error handling activities such as Try Catch, Throw, Rethrow, Retry Scope, and Global Exception Handler.

by Veronika at Jan 08, 2023, 01:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium UiPath-ARDv1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Anglea

2 months ago

Are you kidding me? The price can't be a literal 123456789, that's way too high! I guess the RegEx needs to be a bit more specific to match the minimum price requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Jina

2 days ago

B: I think option C looks like the correct one. It specifies exactly 3 digits, which should work for prices over 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ira

5 days ago

A: Yeah, that price is definitely too high. We need to adjust the RegEx to only identify prices of at least 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

6 days ago

D: Let's go with option C then. It's important to have the correct RegEx to accurately gather the stock market prices we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bulah

11 days ago

C: Yeah, option C seems to be the best choice to ensure we're only capturing prices that meet the minimum requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

1 months ago

B: I think option C is the correct one. It specifies a digit with exactly 3 quantifiers, which should work for prices of at least 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ayesha

2 months ago

A: You're right, the price of 123456789 is way too high. We need to adjust the RegEx to only identify prices of at least 100.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

2 months ago

Hmm, I think I got this. We need to use a digit pattern to match the price, and the quantifier should be 'at least one' to ensure it's at least 100. Feels like a trick question, but I'm ready for it!

upvoted 0 times

...