Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Tibco Exam TCP-BW6 Topic 2 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Tibco's TCP-BW6 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 2
[All TCP-BW6 Questions]

When programming a TIBCO Rendezvous fault-tolerant application, it is a documented best practice to associate fault-tolerant member events with ....

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Aliza
19 hours ago
Wait, we're supposed to associate fault-tolerant events with something? I was just going to throw them in the trash and call it a day. Isn't that how fault-tolerance works?
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
5 days ago
I'm feeling lucky today, so I'm picking A, the default event queue. What could possibly go wrong? Ooh, maybe they'll throw in a free unicorn if I get it right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
9 days ago
C is the way to go, a system event queue. It's like putting the fault-tolerant stuff in the VIP lounge, you know? Gotta keep it separate from the regular plebs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
13 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) a system event queue could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
14 days ago
I'm going with B, a low-priority queue. That way, the fault-tolerant events don't clog up the main event processing. Who needs high-priority when you can just ignore them, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
15 days ago
Hmm, I think the answer is D. A high-priority queue makes the most sense for fault-tolerant member events, right? You don't want those getting lost in the shuffle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
16 days ago
I disagree, I believe it should be A) the default event queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
18 days ago
I think the answer is D) a high-priority queue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77