I'm going with C. It's the only option that really captures the cross-cutting, enterprise-wide nature of TOGAF's approach. Plus, it just sounds more impressive, doesn't it?
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking B might be the right answer, since an enterprise architecture often involves multiple subsidiaries. But C does sound more comprehensive.
I'm not sure, but I think D) The highest level of architecture that can be achieved in a given organization makes sense too. It sounds like it encompasses everything.
I think the correct answer is C. An architecture that crosses multiple systems and functional groups within the enterprise definitely sounds like the TOGAF definition of enterprise architecture.
Narcisa
1 months agoCorrinne
1 days agoJohnathon
2 months agoCristen
1 days agoVirgina
2 days agoLayla
3 days agoEarnestine
5 days agoIlene
1 months agoJenelle
2 months agoGearldine
2 months agoTijuana
2 months agoPolly
28 days agoCiara
1 months agoJessenia
1 months agoEdmond
1 months agoKris
2 months agoSelma
2 months agoHubert
3 months ago