Haha, Version 1.0? More like Version 0.5 if you ask me. But seriously, I think D is the way to go here. Anything less just wouldn't cut it for a TOGAF architecture.
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. But I'm going to go with D just to be safe. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture sounds like it would be considered Version 1.0.
I'm going with B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture. That seems like the most logical step in the TOGAF ADM cycle before moving to a detailed version.
I think the answer is D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture. Anything less than that doesn't seem like it would be denoted as Version 1.0, right?
Annmarie
8 months agoJacquelyne
7 months agoYuonne
7 months agoSharee
7 months agoMarshall
9 months agoKizzy
9 months agoGeorgene
7 months agoElmira
8 months agoLarae
8 months agoJeannetta
8 months agoErnestine
9 months agoTy
9 months agoOzell
9 months agoLeatha
9 months agoAnthony
9 months agoSommer
8 months agoJaime
8 months agoLouvenia
8 months agoCharlesetta
8 months ago