Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-3002 Topic 11 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-3002 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 11
[All SPLK-3002 Questions]

After ITSI is initially deployed for the operations department at a large company, another department would like to use ITSI but wants to keep their information private from the operations group. How can this be achieved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI), the Service Health Score is a metric that provides a quantifiable measure of the overall health and performance of a service. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. The range for a normal Service Health score category is typically from 80 to 100. Scores within this range suggest that the service is performing well, with no significant issues affecting its health. This categorization helps IT and business stakeholders quickly assess the operational status of their services, enabling them to focus on services that may require attention or intervention due to lower health scores.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Gayla
25 days ago
Option C is the clear winner here. Keeping the information private is crucial, and setting permissions is the way to go. Unless you want the operations group to see some... interesting data.
upvoted 0 times
Layla
3 days ago
I agree, setting permissions for each group is key to maintaining confidentiality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
15 days ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. It allows for privacy while still utilizing ITSI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
27 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe I'll just use the force and make the departments share their information. What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
28 days ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Creating teams for each department and assigning services to the teams could be a more flexible approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 months ago
I agree with Arlene, Option C is the most straightforward solution. It's important to keep the information separate and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Creating services for each group and setting the permissions to restrict them to each group sounds like the best way to keep the information private.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
1 days ago
Creating services for each group and setting permissions is a good way to maintain confidentiality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
7 days ago
I agree. It's all about setting up the right permissions to maintain privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
7 days ago
Option C seems like the best choice. It allows for privacy within each department.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
8 days ago
That makes sense. It's important to make sure each department only has access to their own information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
17 days ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Creating services for each group and setting the permissions to restrict them to each group sounds like the best way to keep the information private.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chau
2 months ago
I agree with Alecia, A makes more sense because it allows for customization of services for each group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
3 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77