Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-2003 Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2003 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 1
[All SPLK-2003 Questions]

When writing a custom function that uses regex to extract the domain name from a URL, a user wants to create a new artifact for the extracted domain. Which of the following Python API calls will create a new artifact?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sueann
29 days ago
Regex? More like 're-gex' if you ask me. But C) phantom.create_artifact() is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
1 months ago
D) phantom.add_artifact() could work, but it's a bit vague. I'm confident that C) phantom.create_artifact() is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
17 hours ago
Let's go with phantom.create_artifact() to create the new artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
2 days ago
I agree, phantom.create_artifact() seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
25 days ago
I think C) phantom.create_artifact() is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 months ago
A) phantom.new_artifact() looks promising, but I'm not sure if it's a real Python API call. I'll play it safe and go with C) phantom.create_artifact().
upvoted 0 times
Claribel
16 hours ago
User3: I agree with User2, C) phantom.create_artifact() seems safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
3 days ago
User2: I'm not sure about that, I'm going with C) phantom.create_artifact().
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
10 days ago
User1: I think A) phantom.new_artifact() is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
25 days ago
User4: Let's try C) phantom.create_artifact() and see if it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
29 days ago
User3: I agree, C) phantom.create_artifact() seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 months ago
User2: I'm not sure about that, I'll go with C) phantom.create_artifact() just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 months ago
User1: I think A) phantom.new_artifact() might work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
2 months ago
B) phantom.update() sounds like it would update an existing artifact, not create a new one. I'm going with C) phantom.create_artifact().
upvoted 0 times
Benedict
2 months ago
Yeah, phantom.update() does seem like it would update an existing artifact. Create_artifact() is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
2 months ago
I think you're right, phantom.create_artifact() does sound like it would create a new artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
2 months ago
I think C) phantom.create_artifact() is the correct answer. It's the only option that specifically mentions creating a new artifact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) phantom.add_artifact() could also be a possible option
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
2 months ago
I agree with Son, creating a new artifact would require using phantom.create_artifact()
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) phantom.create_artifact()
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77