Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-2002 Topic 3 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 3
[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

Stakeholders have identified high availability for searchable data as their top priority. Which of the following best addresses this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Luz
1 months ago
Increasing the replication factor? That's a no-brainer. It's like having a backup plan for your backup plan. Gotta love that redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
Marcelle
16 days ago
A) Increasing the replication factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johanna
1 months ago
Indexers with more CPUs? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Definitely not the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Carmen
5 days ago
C) Increasing the number of search heads in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
10 days ago
B) Increasing the replication factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
19 days ago
A) Increasing the search factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tashia
2 months ago
More search heads? Sounds like a lot of overhead. I'd go with option B, it's the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Tashia
3 days ago
Yeah, adding more search heads might be too much. Option B is a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
4 days ago
I agree, increasing the replication factor will definitely improve availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
4 days ago
Option D could also help improve performance with more CPUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
6 days ago
More search heads might be too much to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
6 days ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. It's simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
15 days ago
Increasing the replication factor would definitely improve availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ines
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think increasing the search factor might help with the performance. At least it sounds like it could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
2 months ago
Increasing the replication factor is the way to go! Redundancy is key for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
Rosina
1 months ago
Absolutely, redundancy is crucial for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
1 months ago
B) Increasing the replication factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominic
2 months ago
But wouldn't increasing the replication factor help ensure high availability of searchable data in case of node failures?
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe C) Increasing the number of search heads in the cluster would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
2 months ago
I think the best option is B) Increasing the replication factor in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77