Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Splunk Exam SPLK-2002 Topic 2 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2002 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 2
[All SPLK-2002 Questions]

When using ingest-based licensing, what Splunk role requires the license manager to scale?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Tracie at Aug 07, 2024, 04:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Regenia
1 months ago
Ah, the license manager, the real-life equivalent of trying to fit 10 pounds of data into a 5-pound bag. No wonder it needs to scale up!
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
14 days ago
A) Search peers
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benton
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure the license manager is like that one friend who always wants to be the center of attention. So, it makes sense that B) Search heads would be the ones to give it the spotlight it craves.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
3 days ago
I agree, Search heads definitely play a key role in managing the licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
11 days ago
Yeah, Search heads are like the VIPs when it comes to ingest-based licensing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
12 days ago
Search heads are indeed the ones that require the license manager to scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jimmie
1 months ago
Hmm, let me think... Is the license manager like a diva that needs its own dressing room? If so, then B) Search heads must be the ones to scale it up. They're the stars of the show, after all.
upvoted 0 times
Elinore
29 days ago
So, no need for the license manager to be a diva, huh?
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
1 months ago
Yeah, they're like the main actors in this licensing drama.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
1 months ago
Search heads must be the ones to scale it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reynalda
2 months ago
I'm stumped on this one. I thought the license manager was just a magical box that handled everything, like a genie in a bottle. But I guess C) There are no roles that require the license manager to scale is just too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
Jesusa
1 months ago
B) Search heads
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 months ago
A) Search peers
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of scaling the license manager. As a seasoned Splunk user, I'd say B) Search heads is the way to go. They're the real MVPs when it comes to handling all that data, so they deserve the extra scaling love.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
20 days ago
Search peers do help with distributing search workloads, but when it comes to scaling the license manager, search heads are the key players.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
23 days ago
But what about search peers? Don't they play a role in scaling the license manager too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
2 months ago
I agree, they handle a lot of data and need to be able to scale efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
2 months ago
Search heads are definitely crucial for scaling the license manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curt
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) There are no roles that require the license manager to scale could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
2 months ago
I agree with Sheldon, Search heads make sense because they handle search requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Search heads.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77