Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-1003 Topic 10 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1003 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 10
[All SPLK-1003 Questions]

Which network input option provides durable file-system buffering of data to mitigate data loss due to network outages and splunkd restarts?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Merrilee
1 months ago
Oh, the indignity of it all. Forced to choose between these meager options. Can't you just give me the answer and spare me the humiliation?
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
18 hours ago
D) queueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
12 days ago
C) persistentOueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
15 days ago
B) durableQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
17 days ago
A) diskQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
19 days ago
A) diskQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laine
2 months ago
durableQueueSize? More like 'durable queue of snooze-worthy options', am I right? Let's spice things up a bit, shall we?
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
2 days ago
Yeah, let's mix it up a bit and go with C) persistentOueueSize for a change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
3 days ago
Let's go with A) diskQueueSize, it sounds more exciting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
4 days ago
D) queueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
5 days ago
C) persistentOueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
17 days ago
B) durableQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
18 days ago
A) diskQueueSize
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vilma
2 months ago
queueSize? What is this, amateur hour? Get with the program, folks. durableQueueSize is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Lashaunda
1 months ago
I agree, queueSize is not sufficient for mitigating data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
1 months ago
durableQueueSize is definitely the best choice for durability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
1 months ago
I heard persistentQueueSize is more reliable in terms of data buffering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
diskQueueSize is also a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josephine
2 months ago
Persistent what now? I'm pretty sure the correct answer is durableQueueSize. That's the only one that makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
2 months ago
diskQueueSize? Really? That's so 2010. Clearly, the answer is durableQueueSize. It's in the name, people!
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
1 months ago
Yeah, diskQueueSize is outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
2 months ago
durableQueueSize is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
An
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's either B) durableQueueSize or C) persistentQueueSize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
I agree with Marylyn, durableQueueSize makes sense to prevent data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm thinking durableQueueSize sounds like the right option here. Gotta keep that data safe, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) durableQueueSize.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77