Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-1002 Topic 9 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1002 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 9
[All SPLK-1002 Questions]

When performing a regex field extraction with the Field Extractor (FX), a data type must be chosen before a sample event can be selected. Which of the following data types are supported?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

In Splunk, when using the chart command, the useother parameter can be set to false (f) to remove the 'OTHER' category, which is a bucket that Splunk uses to aggregate low-cardinality groups into a single group to simplify visualization. Here's how the options break down:

A) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action useother=f This command correctly sets the useother parameter to false, which would prevent the 'OTHER' category from being displayed in the resulting visualization.

B) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action usenull=f useother=t This command has useother set to true (t), which means the 'OTHER' category would still be included, so this is not a correct option.

C) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit=10 useother=f Similar to option A, this command also sets useother to false, additionally imposing a limit to the top 10 results, which is a way to control the granularity of the chart but also to remove the 'OTHER' category.

D) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit-10 This command has a syntax error (limit-10 should be limit=10) and does not include the useother=f clause. Therefore, it would not remove the 'OTHER' category, making it incorrect.

The correct answers to rewrite the syntax to remove the 'OTHER' category are options A and C, which explicitly set useother=f.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Timothy
1 months ago
Haha, I'm gonna go with B) sourcetype or host. Just to see if I can stump the test writers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
2 months ago
You know, I bet the answer is actually A) index or source. That would cover the most common field extraction scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
Ty
23 days ago
Yeah, A) index or source makes sense for the data types supported in regex field extraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
28 days ago
I agree, A) index or source would cover a wide range of field extraction needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
1 months ago
I think you're right, A) index or source seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirk
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if it's D) sourcetype or source? That would make sense too, right?
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
19 days ago
User 3: I'm not so sure, what if it's D) sourcetype or source?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, that seems like the correct data types for the Field Extractor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 months ago
User 1: I think it's C) index or sourcetype.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlene
2 months ago
I think it's C) index or sourcetype. That seems to be the most logical choice for a regex field extraction.
upvoted 0 times
Mattie
9 days ago
I believe B) sourcetype or host could also work in certain situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
1 months ago
I've used A) index or source before for regex field extraction and it worked well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 months ago
I think it could also be D) sourcetype or source, depending on the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 months ago
I agree, C) index or sourcetype makes sense for regex field extraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Let's check the documentation for the Field Extractor (FX) to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
2 months ago
I believe it's sourcetype or host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
3 months ago
I think the supported data types are index or sourcetype.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77