Which insurance arrangement, which involved insurance of a loss that had previously occurred, similarly was found not to be insurance for federal income tax purposes?
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'm gonna go with B) retroactive, seems like the only option that fits the description. Though I gotta say, the IRS must have a sense of humor to call that 'insurance'.
Velda
6 days agoMatthew
7 days agoGerri
8 days agoMarica
10 days agoSherly
15 days agoLynna
18 days ago