Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ADA-C01 Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ADA-C01 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 4
[All ADA-C01 Questions]

An Administrator is evaluating a complex query using the EXPLAIN command. The Globalstats operation indicates 500 partitionsAssigned.

The Administrator then runs the query to completion and opens the Query Profile. They notice that the partitions scanned value is 429.

Why might the actual partitions scanned be lower than the estimate from the EXPLAIN output?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When future grants are defined on the same object type for a database and a schema in the same database, the schema-level grants take precedence over the database level grants, and the database level grants are ignored4. This behavior applies to privileges on future objects granted to one role or different roles4. Future grants allow defining an initial set of privileges to grant on new (i.e. future) objects of a certain type in a database or a schema3. As soon as the new objects are created inside the database or schema, the predefined set of privileges are assigned to the object automatically without any manual intervention3.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Corazon
1 months ago
Wait, so the EXPLAIN command is basically the database version of a crystal ball? Gotta love the unpredictability of technology.
upvoted 0 times
Gayla
11 days ago
C) Runtime optimizations such as join pruning can reduce the number of partitions and bytes scanned during query execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
12 days ago
A) The EXPLAIN results always include a 10-15% safety factor in order to provide conservative estimates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andra
1 months ago
Micro-partitions, macro-problems. It's like a game of partition Tetris up in here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
2 months ago
Haha, a 10-15% safety factor? That's like the IT version of 'the dog ate my homework'.
upvoted 0 times
Laurena
1 days ago
C) Runtime optimizations such as join pruning can reduce the number of partitions and bytes scanned during query execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
13 days ago
A) The EXPLAIN results always include a 10-15% safety factor in order to provide conservative estimates.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rikki
2 months ago
Ah, the classic partitions scanned mystery. Looks like runtime optimizations can make a real difference. I bet the data compression also plays a role.
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
1 months ago
User 3: In-flight data compression might also play a role in scanning fewer micro-partitions at the virtual warehouse layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, runtime optimizations can definitely reduce the number of partitions and bytes scanned during query execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
1 months ago
User 1: I think the actual partitions scanned can be lower due to runtime optimizations like join pruning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mattie
2 months ago
The EXPLAIN command is great, but it seems like it's not always accurate. I wonder if there's a way to make the estimates more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Lorrie
1 months ago
D) In-flight data compression will result in fewer micro-partitions being scanned at the virtual warehouse layer than were identified at the storage layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
1 months ago
C) Runtime optimizations such as join pruning can reduce the number of partitions and bytes scanned during query execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paz
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a valid explanation. In-flight data compression could result in fewer partitions being scanned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
2 months ago
I agree with Sina. Join pruning can definitely help in reducing the partitions scanned during query execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
2 months ago
I think the answer is C. Runtime optimizations can reduce the number of partitions scanned.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77