Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CSA Topic 2 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CSA exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 2
[All CSA Questions]

How would you define an Access Control, to allow a user with iti role to have permission to create incident records?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, D

https://www.adzuna.in/details/3252834223

The following are the benefits of building flows using Flow Designer:

C) Provides natural-language descriptions of flow logic:This allows users without programming experience to understand and modify flows,making them more accessible to a wider range of users.

D) Supports No-Code application development:Flow Designer provides a visual interface and pre-built actions that allow users to automate processes without writing code.This can significantly reduce development time and effort.

A) Supports easy integration with 3rd party systems:Flow Designer integrates with a variety of 3rd party systems through the Integration Hub,making it easy to connect your ServiceNow instance to external applications.

Flow Designer offers a low-code/no-code approach to building automation, simplifies complex logic with natural language descriptions, and integrates seamlessly with external systems.


ServiceNow Product Documentation:Exploring Flow Designer -https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/sandiego-application-development/page/administer/flow-designer/concept/flow-designer.html

ServiceNow Community: Flow Designer vs Workflow -https://www.servicenow.com/community/developer-forum/what-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-between-flow-designer/m-p/1407094

Contribute your Thoughts:

Leota
3 days ago
A) Name: incident''; Permission: write; Role: itil - Really? Single quotes around the incident? Seriously, what kind of access control is that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
5 days ago
E) Name: incident. None; Operation: create; Role: itil - This one is definitely wrong. The syntax doesn't make sense, and it's not clear what it's trying to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
10 days ago
D) Name: incident None, Permission: create: Role: itil - I'm not sure about this one. It seems like it would only allow the user to create incident records, but not write to them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
12 days ago
C) Name: incident.*; Operation: write; Permission: itil - This looks like the correct answer, as it allows the user with the ITIL role to have write permission on any incident records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Name: incident None, Permission: create: Role: itil could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Name: incident.*; Operation: write; Permission: itil.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
1 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) Name: incident''; Permission: write; Role: itil.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a