Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CIS-SM Topic 5 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SM exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 5
[All CIS-SM Questions]

A defined relationship between two Configuration Items (CIs), such as Runs on, Depends On, or Contains is called a what?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Joaquin
1 months ago
I'm just hoping the next question isn't about 'Change Control' - that's the kind of relationship status I try to avoid in my personal life!
upvoted 0 times
Maira
4 days ago
C) Relationship Type
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittni
1 months ago
Well, if this was a relationship between two people, I'd call it a 'It's Complicated' type of situation. But in the world of IT, I guess we have to use more professional terms like 'Relationship Type'. Who knew configuration management could be so romantic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 months ago
C) Relationship Type, for sure. It's the only option that specifically mentions 'relationship' between CIs, which is what the question is asking about. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. B) Application to Application Relationship seems like it could be a good fit, but I'm not 100% confident. Maybe I should review my ITIL notes one more time before submitting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
Janine
16 hours ago
I'm leaning towards A) CI Attribute as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
4 days ago
I believe it's D) CI Dependency, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
4 days ago
I think C) Relationship Type might be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
1 months ago
I think C) Relationship Type might be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
2 months ago
I'm going with D) CI Dependency. It sounds like the relationship between two CIs where one depends on the other, which is what the question is asking about.
upvoted 0 times
Delsie
6 days ago
I'm not sure, but B) Application to Application Relationship also sounds plausible. It could be the relationship between two applications within the CIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
10 days ago
I agree with you, D) CI Dependency sounds like the most logical choice. One CI depending on another CI makes sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
18 days ago
I'm leaning towards A) CI Attribute. It seems like the attribute of a CI could define the relationship between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I think it's C) Relationship Type. It makes sense that there would be a specific type of relationship between Configuration Items.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) Relationship Type. The question is asking about the defined relationship between two CIs, and Relationship Type seems to be the most appropriate term for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but CI Dependency also sounds like a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
I agree with Renea, because Relationship Type defines the connection between CIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Relationship Type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but CI Dependency also sounds like a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
2 months ago
I agree with Noemi, because Relationship Type defines the connection between CIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) Relationship Type.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77