Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CIS-SAM Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SAM exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All CIS-SAM Questions]

Risk is configured by default, to calculate Risk = High for a change that is scheduled with only 3 days lead time. Your customer's change policy requires that changes be requested with 5 days lead time.

How would you satisfy this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carylon
1 months ago
I'd say the answer is C - update the 'Calculate Risk UI Action' to just say 'Approve anyway, what could go wrong?'
upvoted 0 times
Louisa
8 days ago
B) Update the Risk Assessment Matrix for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
13 days ago
A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delbert
2 months ago
A is the way to go. It's the simplest and most direct solution to update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
Stacey
15 days ago
D) Update the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
17 days ago
Great idea! That would definitely help meet the customer's change policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 months ago
A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
2 months ago
E all the way! Updating the Risk Condition for Insufficient lead time is the clear winner in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time could also work. What do you guys think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
2 months ago
I agree with Curt. Updating the Risk Property makes the most sense to satisfy the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
2 months ago
D is my pick. Updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time seems like the most logical solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Myong
27 days ago
Yes, that would align with the customer's change policy and ensure the correct risk level is calculated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
1 months ago
I agree, updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 months ago
Yes, that would align with the customer's change policy and ensure the correct risk level is calculated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
I agree, updating the Risk Matrix for insufficient lead time is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sueann
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Updating the Risk Assessment Matrix seems like the most straightforward approach to address the lead time requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most direct way to address the lead time issue and align with the customer's policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
2 months ago
Updating the Risk Assessment Matrix is a clear solution to meet the 5 days lead time requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice to ensure changes are requested with sufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 months ago
I agree, updating the Risk Assessment Matrix would align with the customer's change policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curt
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Update the Risk Property for Insufficient lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77