Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CAD Topic 5 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CAD exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 5
[All CAD Questions]

A customer requests the following data quality measures be added:

1. Incident numbers should be read-only on all lists and forms, for all users.

2. Short Description field should be mandatory, on all records, across all applications, on Insert.

Which type of policy would you use to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Melodie
1 months ago
As someone who's spilled coffee on their laptop during an exam, I can appreciate the need for read-only incident numbers. Wouldn't want to accidentally delete that history!
upvoted 0 times
Elenore
2 days ago
B: Yeah, that sounds like the best option to ensure the incident numbers are read-only for all users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 days ago
A: I think we should use a Data Quality Policy to meet this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleisha
2 months ago
Dictionary Design Policy? Really? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Data Quality Policy is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Micheline
1 months ago
Data Quality Policy would definitely be the most appropriate choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
1 months ago
Yeah, Dictionary Design Policy seems like overkill for these data quality measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
1 months ago
I agree, Data Quality Policy is the best option for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mel
2 months ago
I was leaning towards Field Criteria Policy, but the requirements span across multiple applications, so Data Quality Policy makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
Providencia
22 hours ago
Yes, Data Quality Policy would be the most suitable for enforcing those data quality measures across all applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
4 days ago
Data Quality Policy definitely seems like the way to go to meet those specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
14 days ago
I agree, it seems like the most comprehensive option to ensure consistency across all applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
1 months ago
I think Data Quality Policy would be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
2 months ago
Data Policy seems like a good option too, but Data Quality Policy is probably more specific to these kinds of data quality measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is Data Quality Policy. It seems like the best fit to handle both read-only incident numbers and mandatory short description field requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think a Data Quality Policy could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
2 months ago
I agree with Rosalind, a Field Criteria Policy would be the best choice to make those changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
3 months ago
I think we should use a Field Criteria Policy for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77